Financial Projections For Start-ups For Start ups - Said Business

Basic Steps. • Project Revenues. • Project all costs. Cost of good sold Expenses Development costs. – Cost of good sold, Expenses, Development costs,...

22 downloads 877 Views 3MB Size
Financial Projections For Start‐ups For Start ups

Prof. Thomas Hellmann University of Oxford © 2014

• Magic mirror in my hand,  Magic mirror in my hand who is the fairest in the  land? • My queen, you are the  f i fairest here so true.  h • But Snow White has a  B tS Whit h thousand times more thousand times more  EBITDA than you. y

First Mirror Image First Mirror Image

Business B i Plan

FP reflect business strategies, t t i milestones milestones, scale and viability

Second Mirror Image Second Mirror Image

Learning L i about Self

Process of generating FP forces entrepreneurs to reflect on assumptions

Third Mirror Image Third Mirror Image

IImage to t Investors

FP reflect to in estors the investors prospects p business p and financial needs; also entrepreneurs’ entrepreneurs financial literacy and conceptual clarity

Limitations • Financial Projections are always wrong – Unpredictability of start‐ups – Timing hard to guess – Beware of false precision B ff l ii

• Financial Projections are always out of date – Good entrepreneurs change strategy often Good entrepreneurs change strategy often – Lean start‐ups ‘pivot’

• Financial Projections are always optimistic  Financial Projections are always optimistic – Code language:  “our projections very conservative” – Investors expect optimistic projections – Describe the ‘good case’, not the ‘average case’

• Financial Projections are not a substitute for proper financial  accounting record keeping k

HOW TO  HOW TO DEVELOP  DEVELOP FINANCIAL  FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS?

A Fine Recipe A Fine Recipe

Use two pounds of fresh primary market research Mi in Mix i a cup off secondary d market k data d Lightly sprinkle some theoretical reasoning Decorate subtly with wishful thinking Serve hot

Basic Steps Basic Steps • Project Revenues Project Revenues • Project all costs – Cost Cost of good sold, Expenses, Development costs,  of good sold Expenses Development costs Taxes, etc…

• Build projections Build projections – Cash Flow Statement – Income Statement  I St t t – Balance Sheet

• Present financial projections f l • Manage cash 

REVENUE REVENUE  PROJECTIONS

Revenues Revenues   = Price * Volume P i *V l

Define counting unit Define counting unit • Define unit sale • Use ‘average’ transaction  • Examples – – – – – – – –

Museum Restaurant Online newspaper O li Online video game id Nuclear power station F hi Fashion consultant lt t Military subcontractor Etc…

Estimating Prices Estimating Prices • Customer–centric  – Value proposition – Willingness to pay – Customer segmentation

• Competitor‐based p – Cost‐quality comparison  – Market dynamics Market dynamics – Initial pricing strategy

• Value‐chain constraints Value‐chain constraints Supplier  costs = $2 t $2

Production  costs  (COGS) (COGS) =  $5

Price to  distributor  d st buto = $9

Price to  retailer =  eta e $15

Average  discounted   retail price  t il i = $24

Suggested  retail price  eta p ce = $30

Estimating Quantities Estimating Quantities • Four approaches h 1. 2. 3. 4.

Top‐down Bottom‐up Copy‐cat Copy cat More‐of‐the‐same

• In practice, use combination In practice use combination

The S curve The S curve Revenues

Time

Top down revenue projections Top down revenue projections

Top down revenue projections Top down revenue projections • Define relevant market segment g • Existing markets: – Look up current market revenues – Project market growth rate – Estimate obtainable market share

• (Hopefully) Emerging markets: – Estimate potential market size – Estimate market adoption curve (S‐curve) Estimate market adoption curve (S curve) – Estimate obtainable market share

• Classical mistakes: Classical mistakes: – “Everybody in China will buy our product” – “We only need 1% of a $1Billion market”

Example: Asia Renal Care p China Population (in mil) Treatment rate Incidence rate (in mil) People with ESRD Urban population Urban population Urban ESRD Insured Insured Urban ESRD Price per treatment Average yearly visits Annual revenue per patient Total market size Total market size

1199 19 629 754171 30 00% 30.00% 226251 30.00% 67875 $53 130 $6,890 $467 661 437 $467,661,437

Taiwan

China / Taiwan 21 57.10 630 630 13230 57.00 100 00% 100.00% 13230 17.10 100.00% 13230 5.13 $156 0.34 130 $20,280 0.34 $268 304 400 $268,304,400 1 74 1.74

Based on “Asia Renal Care” HBS Case Study 9-800-243

Bottom up revenue projections Bottom‐up revenue projections

Bottom up revenue projections Bottom‐up revenue projections • Basic idea – Define basic unit of product / service Define basic unit of product / service – Estimate customers purchasing units  – Multiply by average price – Estimate customer growth over time Estimate customer growth over time

• Approach focuses on ability to deliver!

Example: Fast Ceviche Example: Fast Ceviche • Revenues from typical customer – Ceviche + side dish + drinks = £10

• Number of customers and hours of operations – Lunch: 50 customers L h 50 t – Afternoon: 20 customers – Evening: 50 customers  Evening: 50 customers

• Number of days in operation – 5 days a week; 48 weeks y

• Total annual revenues – £10 * 120 = £1,200 daily revenues – £1,200 * 5 = £6,000 weekly revenues – $6000 * 48 = £288,000 yearly revenues

• Ramp‐up to total revenues?

Combining Top Down and Bottom Up Combining Top‐Down and Bottom Up • Construct Market Share: MS = BU / TD Construct Market Share: MS = BU / TD – BU = Bottom up counting – TD = Top down market size p

• Case 1: MS < 10% – Small market share – Market segment defined too broadly – Bottom‐up strategy too conservative

• Case 2: 10% < MS < 100% – Is market share realistic? – For MS > 50%: why can you dominate the market   F MS > 50% h d i t th k t

• Case 3: MS > 100% – Stop dreaming: market doesn Stop dreaming: market doesn’tt support growth strategy   support growth strategy

Copy Cats and More of the same Copy‐Cats and More‐of‐the‐same

Copy Cats and More of the same Copy‐Cats and More‐of‐the‐same • Industry comparables • Competitor comparables  • For established businesses: use own recent growth rates • Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance • Works best at top of S‐curve 

The S curve The S curve Revenues Over-estimate rapid growth Reasonable R bl estimates ti t off stable growth

Under-estimate Under estimate early growth

Time

COST PROJECTIONS

27

Cost of goods sold (COGS) Cost of goods sold (COGS) • Estimate cost of sourcing physical inputs Estimate cost of sourcing physical inputs • Express as % of sales, but... • With “increasing returns to scale” COGS decrease  with volume, due to input fixed costs, volume with volume, due to input fixed costs, volume  discounts, etc… • With  With “decreasing decreasing returns to scale returns to scale” COGS increase  COGS increase with volume, due to capacity constraints

• Estimation methods E ti ti th d • Direct cost estimates from suppliers and experts  • Inferred from competitor cost ratios

Example Coffee Costalot:  C ff C t l t Market leader Price of standard cup: £4 Cost of good sold: £2 f COGS / Revenues = 50% Gross margin of 100%  Profit of £2 per cup Profit of £2 per cup

Coffee Cheapo:  Coffee Cheapo: Start‐up challenger Cheaper price: £3 Use Costalot ratio: 50% Cost of goods sold: £1.5 Gross margin of 100%  Profit of £1 5 per cup Profit of £1.5 per cup

Example Coffee Costalot:  C ff C t l t Market leader Price of standard cup: £4 C Cost of good sold: £2 f d ld £2 COGS / Revenues = 50% Gross margin of 100% Profit of £2 per cup Profit of £2 per cup

Coffee Cheapo:  Coffee Cheapo: Start‐up challenger Cheaper price: £3 Use Costalot ratio: 50% Cost of goods sold: £1.5 Gross margin of 100%  Profit of £1 5 per cup Profit of £1.5 per cup

Example Coffee Costalot:  C ff C t l t Market leader Price of standard cup: £4 Cost of good sold: £2 f COGS / Revenues = 50% Gross margin of 100% Profit of £2 per cup Profit of  £2 per cup

Coffee Cheapo:  Coffee Cheapo: Start‐up challenger Cheaper price: £3 Realistic COGS: £2.40 COGS / Revenues = 80% Gross margin of 25% Profit of £0 5 per cup Profit of £0.5 per cup

Expenses • Cost of facilities and equipment q p – Rent/lease: recurring expense – Own: one‐time capital expenditure

• Labour expenses – Salary, Benefits, Training costs, Bonuses – Stock options? S k i ? – Founder salaries?

• Other expenses Other expenses – – – –

Marketing and Sales Legal g Admin Overhead Etc…

Budget for founder salaries? Budget for founder salaries? • Before outside financing, founder salaries largely  meaningless • Outside investors not too fond of paying high salaries  in early stages • Founders need to set expectations that one day they  want to eat something better than Ramen soup! a o ea so e g be e a a e soup – Write employment agreement – Define founder salary  Define founder salary – Take reduced salary for initial years

Development cost projections Development cost projections • “Mundane” set‐up costs  – Legal, Licenses, Office space, Basics 

• Pre‐revenue development plan – Short for restaurants Sh f – Long for biotechs

• Main development costs  Main development costs – Employees (see expenses) – Capital expenditures (e.g. equipment) p p ( g q p ) – Cost of licensing‐in technology, protecting IP

• Define milestones and timing  – Define demonstrable progress markers • Prototype, Beta customers, etc… 

– Difficulty of predicting ‘pivots’ Diffi lt f di ti ‘ i t ’

Taxes etc Taxes etc… • Taxes to be paid – VAT – Corporate taxes – Industry specific levies Industry specific levies

• Tax credits – Differ by country, industry, over time, etc…

• Other – Interest payments

Example of “operating Example of  operating stacks stacks”

100% 90%

15% 10% Net earnings

80% 70%

Overhead 40%

M&S

60%

R&D

50%

COGS

40%

15%

30% 20%

20%

10% 0% % of revenues

INTEGRATED INTEGRATED  PROJECTIONS

Some useful links Some useful links • Stanford Technology Venture Formation http://www.stanford.edu/class/msande273/resources.html – Peter Kent’s financial model (too complex) – Jeff Kuhn’s model (too simple)

• Hellmann Model http://strategy.sauder.ubc.ca/hellmann/ – Goldilocks says: (Just right) 

• WWW – Lots of models freely available

Fundamentals versus Pro Formas • Fundamental projections: – Bring together all revenues and costs – Pay attention to timing of cash flows

• Pro Forma statements:  – Income Statement (a.k.a. Profit and loss statement) • Establish viability & profitability

– Cash flow statement • Determine financial needs  • Monitor survival

– Balance sheet  B l h t • Estimate “book value” • Resilience  Resilience

How long, how often, how detailed? How long, how often, how detailed? • Length – Minimum 1‐2 years; typical 3‐5 years; maximum ??? Minimum 1‐2 years; typical 3‐5 years; maximum ??? – Depends on industry and development cycle • Retail: a few months • Software: a few years • Biotech / Cleantech: a few decades

• Frequency  Frequency – Monthly: “only the paranoid survive” – Quarterly:  Quarterly: “balanced balanced approach approach”;; still captures seasonality still captures seasonality – Yearly: “big picture”

• Detail – In a presentation only shows highlights – Be ready for justifying each number!

Cash Flow Forecastingg Monthly Cash Balances

Quarterly Cash Balances 45000

45000

40000

40000

35000

35000

30000

30000

25000

25000

20000

20000

15000

15000

10000 10000 5000 5000 0 0 Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

‐5000

CASH FLOW  CASH FLOW MANAGEMENT

Working capital Working capital • Working Capital = Current assets – Current liabilities • If working capital positive: cash burn! g p p – Need cash to run the business

• If working capital negative: cash machine!  – Get paid before delivering services p g

• In growing business, positive working capital means cash burn  increasing over time Beware of the fume date!!! • Beware of the fume date!!!

Hellmann’ss Haiku Hellmann Haiku

TAMO = Then A Miracle Occurs TAMO = Then A Miracle Occurs

Trade credit • Prerequisites  – Repeat purchasing  R h i – Good customer standing

• Standardized terms (industry specific) – Pay in less than x days to get discount (1‐d) Pay in less than x days to get discount (1 d)*p p – Pay in less than y days and pay in full (p) – Pay in more than y days and pay incur penalty

• Trade credit looks attractive to cash‐ constrained entrepreneurs • Trade credit can be surprisingly expensive T d dit b ii l i – Do the math!!!

Implied capital cost of trade credit Implied capital cost of trade credit Discount

Extra Days

1%

2%

3%

5%

10%

15

27.28%

62.40%

107.72%

242.48%

1153.66%

30

12.82%

27.43%

44.12%

85.06%

254.07%

45

8.37%

17.54%

27.59%

50.73%

132.31%

60

6.22%

12.89%

20.05%

36.04%

88.17%

90

4.10%

8.42%

12.96%

22.77%

52.42%

120

3.06%

6.25%

9.57%

16.64%

37.17%

CLASSIC CLASSIC  MISTAKES

Classic mistakes (I) • Revenues – Overestimate speed of revenues Overestimate speed of revenues – Unjustifiable revenue spurts – Missing costs of generating sales – Distinguish listed and actual average price g g p • Cost – Forget costs of running business Forget costs of running business – Plan for underutilized assets – Full labor costs • including benefits, training, bonuses, etc…

Classic mistakes (II) • Cash flows – Late payments and collection costs – Underestimate true cost of trade credit – Underestimate delays in raising funding • Overall – Ignore industry norms – False precision – Too much detail – Mismatch between financials and business plan

Final words of wisdom Final words of wisdom Cash flows  C h fl are more important  p than your mommy!

Thank You! Thank You! • • • • • •

Thomas Hellmann Professor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Saïd Business School, University of Oxford  Park End Street, Oxford OX1 1HP, UK T: +44 (0)1865 288937 [email protected]

APPENDIX

PRESENTATION PRESENTATION  EXAMPLE #1 EXAMPLE #1

Financial Projection $120 $100 $80

$Millionss

$60 $40 $20 $ $0 ‐$20 Total Revenue Gross Margin Total Operating Expenses Income Before Int & Taxes

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

$8,800  ($18,939)

$132,800  ($175,748)

$864,000  ($48,167)

$21,160,000  $9,971,397 

$99,550,000  $48,566,526 

$2,642,643  ($2,661,581)

$6,339,171  ($6,514,919)

$12,303,334  ($12,351,500)

$21,733,046  ($11,761,650)

$43,654,877  $4,911,649 

Operating Stacks 84%

15%

PRESENTATION PRESENTATION  EXAMPLE #2 EXAMPLE #2

Financials: Business Model

Unit economics Unit economics

Annual Recurring Annual Recurring

Sale Price: $3250 $

Premium Package: $500

Unit Cost: $1700

Annual Costs:

‐ Goggles / Sensor $950 gg / $

‐ Extended Warranty Extended Warranty

‐ Gloves $400 

‐ Live Tech Support

‐ Accelerometer $350 Accelerometer $350

‐ Training Website Training Website

U it Gross Unit G Margin: M i 40%

Financial Model: Assumptions p Product per Customer per Customer

•1

• 50% Uptake of Premium Package                                 • 2% Target Market Entry Share                                     

Growth Rate Growth Rate

• 2% + 1%n years  2% + 1%

Inventory

• 10% Annual Sales

Salary

• +5% Annual

S ft Software Updates U d t

• Quarterly Q t l

Product Iterations

• Every 2 years

Profit and Loss $MM

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 6

Unit Sales

0

9

862

1679

2934

5478

Head Count Head Count

5

5

8

13

15

21

Revenue

0

0.03

2.9

6.0

10.7

20.1

Gross Profit

0

0.02

1.5

3.2

5.7

10.7

Gross  Margin % Margin %

49

49

49

50

51

51

Operating Expenses

0.8

0.7

1.5

1.9

2.5

3.8

EBITDA

‐0.8

‐0.7

0

1.2

3.2

6.9

N tI Net Income

‐0.8 08

‐0.7 07

0

09 0.9

22 2.2

49 4.9

Revenue and Net Income

P b k Payback X

Break Even Break-Even Point X

S d Round Seed R d1 X

X

Operating p g Stacks

PRESENTATION PRESENTATION  EXAMPLE #3 EXAMPLE #3

Millions

R Revenue & Market Penetration &M k P i $160 $160 

$152 $152 

100% 90%

$140 

80%

$116 $116 

$ $120 

70%

$100 

60% $76 

$80 

50% 40%

$60  $41 

$40 

30% 30% 23%

20%

15%

$20 $20 

10%

8%

$‐

0% 2013

2014

2015

Revenue

2016

2017

Market Penetration

2018

2019

G Go to Market M k 2013 Sales

Alpha p customer

Head Count Cou

13

Hardware

First release

Software

Mouse, keyboard

2014

2015 Distributor Phase I

Beta customer

31 Shrink

final

2017

Distributor Phase II

67 Rev 2

PACS specific

2016

102

139

Ongoing development

2 PACS/year

A Assumptions i 25% of all  operations

• 50%‐75% of operations use imaging. • Half of those are long enough.

33% Distributor  Markup

• Retail price of $112.50 • Wholesale price of $75.00 Wholesale price of $75 00

Slow Medical  Market

• 15% penetration in 5 years • 30% penetration in 7 years

Class I Device

• No FDA approval No FDA approval • 90 day pre‐market notification

Steady Adoption

• Growth rate is linear

Millions

Fi Financial Projections i lP j i $160  $140  $120  $100  $80  $60  $40  $20  $‐ ‐$20 

$ $3.4 ‐$1.4 2013

‐$4.1 2014 Revenue

‐$8.6 2015

$9.6

$16.2

‐$0.8 2016

Gross Profit

2017 EBITDA

2018

2019

O Operating Stacks i S k 100% 26%

14% 18%

80% 16% 60%

14%

28%

45%

40%

15%

18%

18%

30%

22%

22%

21%

25%

26%

35%

35%

34%

40% 20% 0% 2013 R&D

2014

Sales/Marketing

2015 Operations

2016

2017

General & Administrative

F di Mil Funding Milestones 2013 Cash R Reserve

Q1

Q2

Q3

2014 Q4

Q2

13

Hardware

First release

Software

Mouse, keyboard

Alpha customer

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

31

67

Shrink

final

Beta customer

2017

2016 Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Series C $8.5 MM

Series B $ MM $5

Series A $1.5 MM

Head Count

Sales

Q1

2015

Rev 2

PACS specific

Distributor Phase I

102

139

Ongoing development

2 PACS/year

Distributor Phase II

Q4