Antimicrobial activities of microalgae: an invited review

Antimicrobial activities of microalgae: an invited review Helena M. Amaro1, A. Catarina Guedes1, F. Xavier Malcata1,2* 1CIMAR/CIIMAR – Centro Interdis...

14 downloads 788 Views 1MB Size
Science against microbial pathogens: communicating current research and technological advances ______________________________________________________________________________ A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.)

Antimicrobial activities of microalgae: an invited review Helena M. Amaro1, A. Catarina Guedes1, F. Xavier Malcata1,2* 1

CIMAR/CIIMAR – Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental, Rua dos Bragas nº 289, P-4050-123 Porto, Portugal 2 ISMAI – Instituto Superior da Maia, Avenida Carlos Oliveira Campos, Castelo da Maia, P-4475-690 Avioso S. Pedro, Portugal * Corresponding author Microalgae exhibit a huge genetic diversity; they may indeed appear as individual cells, colonies or extended filaments. Ubiquitously distributed throughout the biosphere, they can grow essentially under all types of environmental conditions. Microalgae are thus some of the most promising stakeholders in blue biotechnology: besides their notable metabolic versatility, they require only low cost inorganic N- and P-sources, sequester CO2 as base nutrient, and rely on sunlight to fulfill energy requirements. They are known as well for their richness in bioactive compounds, with promising applications in pharmaceutical formulations; some are rather active against unwanted bacteria found in aquaculture and food processing, whereas others exhibit antiviral, antifungal and antialgal features. Their cell-free extracts have accordingly been tested as additives for food and feed formulation, in attempts to circumvent use of antimicrobial compounds of synthetic origin, or subtherapeutical doses of regular antibiotics. Recall, in this regard, the growing resistance of some bacterial strains, owing to the widespread and almost unrestricted use of antibiotics in cattle handling and by consumers at large. This chapter tackles all such items; for methodological reasons, it is divided into five sections: (1) introduction; (2) antibacterial action; (3) antiviral action; (4) antifungal action; and (5) antimicroalgal action. Keywords: antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antimicroalgal

1. Introduction Microalgae exhibit a notable biodiversity; they can in fact be found as individual cells, colonies or extended filaments. These microorganisms account for the basis of the food chain in aquatic ecosystems; they posses the intrinsic ability to take up H2O and CO2 that, with the aid of solar energy, are used to synthesize complex organic compounds, which are subsequently accumulated and/or secreted as primary or secondary metabolites. They are ubiquitously distributed throughout the biosphere, where they have adapted to survival under a large spectrum of environmental stresses – e.g. heat, cold, drought, salinity, photo-oxidation, anaerobiosis, osmotic pressure and UV exposure [1]; hence, they may grow essentially under all environmental conditions available, ranging from freshwater to extreme salinity, and can survive in moist, black earth and even desert sands – and they have as well been found in clouds, being in addition essential components of coral reefs. This wide span of ecosystems contributes to the myriad of chemical compounds that they are able to synthesize, thus accounting for their unique potential as stakeholders in blue biotechnology. Almost 18,500 new compounds have been isolated from marine sources between 1965 and 2006, yet one estimates that ca. 97% of all existing marine compounds have not yet been obtained nor characterized [2]. Therefore, microalgae (especially those from marine origin) represent a unique opportunity to discover novel metabolites, or to produce known metabolites at lower costs. The rate of rediscovery – i.e. finding metabolites which were already obtained from other biological sources, is expected to be far lower (i.e. <5%) in microalgae than in more conventional microorganisms (i.e. > 90%) [3]. Microalgae possess the extra advantage of a substantial metabolic plasticity, dependent on their physiological state (i.e. stressed vs. nonstressed); likewise, their secondary metabolism can easily be triggered by most forms of externally applied stress (e.g. lack of a nitrogen source) [4]. Microalgae have for long been used with therapeutic purposes; their systematic screening for biologically active principles began in the 1950s. However, in the last decade microalgae have become the focus of extensive research efforts, aimed at finding novel compounds that might lead to therapeutically useful agents [5-7]. Microalgae have meanwhile been found to produce antibiotics: a large number of microalgal extracts and/or extracellular products have proven antibacterial, antifungal, antiprotozoal and antiplasmodial [8-11]. The antimicrobial activity of microalgae has been attributed to compounds belonging to several chemical classes – including indoles, terpenes, acetogenins, phenols, fatty acids and volatile halogenated hydrocarbons [6,7]; for instance, the antimicrobial activity of supercritical extracts obtained from the microalga Chaetoceros muelleri were related to its lipid composition [12]. However, the antimicrobial activity detected in several pressurized extracts from Dunaliella salina may be explained not only by several fatty acids, but also by such compounds as - and -ionone, -cyclocitral, neophytadiene and phytol [10]. Efforts to identify the compounds directly responsible for those antimicrobial features – e.g. chlorellin [13], have been on the run, but are still relatively incipient owing the some new classes of compounds found.

1272

©FORMATEX 2011

Science against microbial pathogens: communicating current research and technological advances _______________________________________________________________________________ A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.)

Microalgal cell-free extracts are already being tested as additives for food and feed formulation, in attempts to replace antimicrobial compounds of synthetic origin currently in use – including subtherapeutical doses of antibiotics employed as prophilatic measure in animal breeding [14]. Recall, in this regard, the growing resistance of some bacterial strains arising from the widespread and essentially unrestricted use of antibiotics in cattle handling, and by domestic consumers use via self-prescription [15,16]. However, a key factor for their eventual economic feasibility is the possibility of operating large photobioreactors under aseptic conditions, which are able to produce biomass and metabolites to sufficiently high levels [17,18].

2. Antibacterial action The past decade has witnessed a significant increase in the resistance of pathogenic bacteria to antibacterial agents – with direct implications in human morbidity and mortality. Hence, attention has been paid to a more detailed understanding of the mechanisms underlying antimicrobial resistance – as well as to improved methods to detect resistance, new antimicrobial options for treatment of infections caused by resistant microorganisms, and methods to prevent emergence and spreading of resistance in the first place. Most efforts were devoted to the study of antibiotic resistance in bacteria for several reasons: (i) bacterial infections are responsible for most community-acquired and nosocomial infections; (ii) the large and expanding number of antibacterial classes offers a more diverse range of resistance mechanisms; and (iii) the ability to move bacterial resistance determinants into standard, well-characterized bacterial strains facilitates more detailed studies of the underlying molecular mechanisms [19]. Pratt et al. [20] isolated the first antibacterial compound from a microalga, Chlorella; a mixture of fatty acids, viz. chlorellin, was found to be responsible for that inhibitory activity against both Gram+ and Gram- bacteria. Research aimed at identifying antibacterial active principles produced by microalgae has meanwhile boomed [11]. This realisation arose e.g. from the risk associated with several multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains, which have been causing an increased concern in healthcare institutions worldwide – since they are not susceptible to most conventional antibiotics. Hence, discovery of novel antibacterial compounds following distinct biochemical mechanisms of action is urged. Although microalgae can synthesize a few useful products, search for novel antibiotics is still incipient; illustrative examples are tabulated in Table 1.

©FORMATEX 2011

1273

Science against microbial pathogens: communicating current research and technological advances ______________________________________________________________________________ A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.)

Table 1 Antibacterial features of selected compounds from microalgae.

Microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum

Active compound

Target microorganism

Reference

Eicosapentaenoic acid

MRSA, Listonella anguillarum, Lactococcus garvieae, Vibrio spp.

[21,22]

Short chain fatty acids

-

[23]

Short-chain fatty acids (butanoic acid and methyl lactate)

Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus

[24]

Unsaturated, saturated long chain fatty acids

Vibrio spp.

[25]

Euglena viridis

Organic extracts

Pseudomonas, Aeromonas, Edwardsiella, Vibrio, E. coli

[26]

S. costatum

Extra-metabolites

Listeria monocytogenes

[27]

Haematococcus pluvialis

Skeletonema costatum

Staurastrum gracile Pleurastrum terrestre

[28] Methanolic extracts

-

Chlorococcum sp.

Aqueous extract

-

[28]

Chlorococcum HS-101

α-Linolenic acid

-

[29]

Chlorokybus atmophyticus

Acetone extract

-

[28]

Dictyosphaerium pulchellum Klebsormidium crenulatum

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Chlorella vulgaris

Methanolic and hexanolic extracts

S. aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Bacillus subtilis, E. coli, Salmonella typhi

[30]

Antibiotics are typically less effective against Gram- bacteria because of their complex, multilayered cell wall structure – which makes it more difficult for the active compound to penetrate them [31]; this justifies why the antibacterial activity of the supernatant (and methanolic extracts) is more potent against Gram+ than Gram- bacteria [11,30]. The activity of cell lysates of P. tricornutum against both Gram+ and Gram- bacteria (including MRSA) – even at micromole levels, was attributed to eisosapentaenoic acid, a compound synthesized de novo by diatoms [32]; this polyunsaturated fatty acid is found chiefly as a polar lipid species in structural cell components (e.g. membranes), and plays a role in microalgal defense – as it is toxic to grazers [33], as well as a precursor of aldehydes with deleterious effects upon such consumers as copepods [34]. Similarly, hexadecatrienoic acid isolated from P. tricornutum displays activity against (the Gram+ pathogen) S. aureus. High levels of palmitoleic acid and other bioactive fatty acids were also found in the fusiform morphotype of P. tricornutum, rather than in the oval morphs of this microalga; that fatty acid is active against various non-marine, Gram+ human pathogens at micromolar concentrations – and its lethal effects start immediately upon exposure [22]. Pressurized (liquid) ethanol extracts from Haematococcus pluvialis in its red stage possess antimicrobial activity against a Gram- bacterium, E. coli, and a Gram+ bacterium, S. aureus; this was once again associated with the presence of short-chain fatty acids, namely butanoic and methyl lactic acids [24]. The exact mechanism of action of fatty acids remains unknown: they may act upon multiple cellular targets, even though cell membranes are the most probable ones – as membrane damage will likely lead to cell leakage and reduction of nutrient uptake, besides inhibiting cellular respiration; conversely, Desbois [21] claimed a peroxidative process.

1274

©FORMATEX 2011

Science against microbial pathogens: communicating current research and technological advances _______________________________________________________________________________ A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.)

Furthermore, compounds synthesized by Scenedesmus costatum, and partially purified from its organic extract, exhibited activity against aquaculture bacteria because of their fatty acids longer than 10 carbon atoms in chain length – which apparently induce lysis of bacterial protoplasts. The ability of fatty acids at large to interfere with bacterial growth and survival has been known for quite some time, but recent structure-function relationship studies suggest that said ability depends on both their chain length and degree of unsaturation. Such compounds as cholesterol can antagonize antimicrobial features [12], so both composition and concentration of free lipids should be taken into account [35]. Among microalgal-derived oxylipins, the antibacterial activities of polyunsaturated aldehydes deserve a special mention. Such compounds are synthesized by diatoms, e.g. S. costatum and Thalassiosira rotula. One illustrative example is decadienal – probably derived from (the polyunsaturated) arachidonic acid (C20:4 n-3), which exhibits a strong activity against such important human pathogens as MRSA and Haemophilus influenza – with MIC values of 7.8 and 1.9 μg/mL, respectively, and well as against E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis (Gram- and Gram+ bacteria, respectively). Furthermore, it impairs growth of diverse marine bacteria, such as (the Gram-) Aeromonas hydrophila, L. anguillarum, Alteromonas haloplankti, Photobacterium phosphoreum and Psychrobacter immobilis, and the (Gram+) Planococcus citreus and Micrococcus luteus [22].

3. Antiviral action A number of infectious diseases caused by viruses have emerged (and re-emerged) in recent years. Although several antiviral drugs have been specifically developed, drug-resistant mutations are constantly occuring – so new antiviral active principles are necessary, especially those from sources that do not constitute (or are exposed to) viral pools. This is why microalgae have received a strong attention as potential suppliers of antiviral agents [36]; a few selected examples are listed in Table 2. Table 2 Antiviral features of selected compounds from microalgae.

Microalga

Active compound

Mechanism of action

Navicula directa

Polysaccharide

Inhibition of hyaluronidase

p-KG03 exopolysaccharide Pheophorbide -, -like compounds

Inhibition (or slowing down) of cytopathic effect

HSV1 & 2, Influenza A virus Encephalomyocarditis virus

Inhibition of cytopathic effect

HSV1

[39]

VHSV, ASFV

[40]

Enterovirus 71

[41]

Influenza virus A & B, RSV A & B, HSV-1

[42]

Gyrodinium impudicum Dunaliella primolecta Chlorella autotrophica Ellipsoidon sp.

Sulfated polysaccharides

Cryptomonads

Allophycocyanin

Cochlodinium polykrikoide

Extracellular sulfated polysaccharides

Replication inhibition C. autotrophica: 47.4-67.4 % Ellipsoidon sp.: up to 44 % Inhibition of cytopathic effect, delay in synthesis of viral RNA Inhibition of cytopathic effect

Target virus

Reference [37] [38]

Viral growth is generally divided into three stages, and antiviral action may take place at a single or more stages: Stage I, which consists on adsorption and invasion of cells; Stage II, or eclipse phase, during which the cell is forced to synthesize multiple copies of said virus; and Stage III, or maturity and release of virus particles. For instance, the antiHSV activity of the antiviral compound acyclovir® is expressed at stage II, but the anti-HSV factor from Dunaliella sp. inactivates the viral function at stage I [43,44]. Sulphated exopolysaccharides from marine microalgae have been claimed to interfere with Stage I of some enveloped viruses [45]; they offer competitive advantages because of their broad antiviral spectrum against e.g. HSV and HIV-1 [46]. Apparently, their inhibitory effect arises from interaction with the positive charges on the virus or on the cell surface – which prevents penetration of the former into the host cells [47,48]; they may also selectively inhibit reverse transcriptase in the case of HIV, thus hampering production of new viral particles after infection [49] – yet the exact step during viral replication when they act remains to be elucidated. Antiviral highly sulfated polysaccharides from several species of red microalgae consist mainly of xylose, glucose and galactose [49,50]; they are unusually stable when exposed to extreme pH and temperature [51]. Another important antiviral action associated with sulfated polysaccharides is against two enveloped rhabdoviruses bearing significant economic importance: the viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) of salmonid fish and the

©FORMATEX 2011

1275

Science against microbial pathogens: communicating current research and technological advances ______________________________________________________________________________ A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.)

African swine fever virus (ASFV) – see Table 2. Extracts from marine microalgae can find a prophylactic usefulness in hatcheries against VHSV, and perhaps also against other fish-contaminating enveloped viruses in addition to mammalian viral diseases [40]. Consequently, application of such compounds appears to be a particularly attractive option in anti-viral therapy, because their pleiotrophic mode of action is less likely to lead to development of resistant mutants than other compounds that exhibit only one target throughout the viral life cycle. NMR and MS analyses of the antiviral compounds synthesized by D. primolecta [39] revealed structures not yet found in nature; in particular, the pheophorbide-like substances found had the proton at position 21 replaced by a hydroxyl group, which might be the key for the observed unique antiviral activity. A homopolysaccharide of galactose with uronic acid (3.0 %, w/w) and sulfate groups (10.3 %, w/w) from Gyrodinium impudicum strain KG03 [38] exhibited an impressive activity in vitro (EC50=26.9 µg/mL) against swine encephalomyocarditis virus, which is widespread at the subclinical level; its acute form leads to sudden death in piglets, as well as reproductive failure in adult animals [52]. Despite their successful antiviral performance, the metabolic pathways leading to sulfated polysaccharides are still poorly known. Their secretion by unicellular red algae was originally characterized via radiolabeling – which showed biosynthesis of the carbon chain, and sulfation of the resulting polysaccharide to occur in the Golgi apparatus [53]; these findings were confirmed in Porphyridium sp. [54] and other red microalgae [55]. More recently, Keidan et al. [56] used 14C pulse-chase experiments and ultrastructural microscopy to conclude that brefeldin A – a membrane-traffic inhibitor of the Golgi apparatus, decreases the contents of the bound and the soluble forms of polysaccharides, while inhibiting cell-wall binding of polysaccharides to a greater extent than its soluble counterpart (in both actively growing and resting cells). Discovery of small molecules that can specifically disrupt a particular protein-protein interface remains a challenge – but is of a particular interest in virology, since the antiviral drugs currently available target only viral proteins.

4. Antifungal action The study of resistance to antifungal agents has lagged for behind that of antibacterial resistance – likely because fungi were not recognized as important pathogens until several years ago [57,58]. For instance, the annual death rate caused by candidiasis remained steady between 1950 and 1970, but increased significantly ever since in association with several changes in medical practice – including more widespread use of therapies that depress the immune system, frequent and often indiscriminate use of broad-spectrum antibacterial agents, common use of indwelling intravenous devices, and advent of chronic immunosuppressive viral infections (e.g. AIDS). The associated increase in fungal infections prompted search for newer and safer agents to combat fungal infections [19] – and a few noteworthy results encompassing microalgae are listed in Table 3.

1276

©FORMATEX 2011

Science against microbial pathogens: communicating current research and technological advances _______________________________________________________________________________ A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.)

Table 3 Antifungal features of selected compounds from microalgae.

Microalga source

Active compound

Target microorganism

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Chlorella vulgaris

Reference

Candida kefir, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus fumigatus

[30]

A. niger, Trichomonas foetus

[59]

Methanolic extracts

Oocystis sp. Scenedesmus obliquus Amphidinium sp.

Karatungiols

Goniodoma pseudogoniaulax

Goniodomin A

-

[28,60]

Gambierdiscus toxicus

Polyether compounds (gambieric acids A and B)

-

[28,61]

-

[28]

-

[28]

Prorocentrum lima Dinophysis fortii Haematococcus pluvialis

Polyether compounds Butanoic acid and methyl lactate

Chlorella pyrenoidosa, Scenedesmus quadricauda

-

Candida albicans

[24]

A. niger, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium herquei, Fusarium moniliforme, Helminthosporium sp., Alternaria brassicae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, C. albicans

[62]

Katircioglu et al. [63] studied 10 microalgal strains, previously isolated from distinct freshwater reservoirs in Turkey, for their antifungal performance upon three yeasts (S. cerevisiae, C. albicans and Candida tropicalis); Oscillatoria sp. and Chlorococcus sp. were found to perform best. Pressurized liquid ethanol extracts of H. pluvialis were tested by Santoyo et al. [24] against C. albicans and A. niger; all extracts were active against the former, but not against A. niger. The main compounds responsible for such antifungal activity were claimed to be butanoic acid and methyl lactate, both of which had previously been described to possess antimicrobial activity [64,65]. Abedin and Taha [62], on the other hand, studied the antifungal activity of two green microalgae (C. pyrenoidosa and S. quadricauda) against 8 fungi (A. niger, A. flavus, P. herquei, F. moniliforme, Helminthosporium sp., A. brassicae, S. cerevisiae and C. albicans) – with favourable results for nearly all extracts; these data are consistent with those by Volk and Furkert [66], who found microalgae to exhibit a high biological activity against P. aeruginosa, C. tropicalis and S. cerevisiae. The supernatant (methanolic and hexane) extracts of several microalgae against four strains of fungi (C. kefyr, C. albicans, A. niger and A. fumigatus) were tested by Ghasemi et al. [30]; nine Chlorella vulgaris spp., Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Oocystis sp. and S. obliquus proved active against C. kefyr, A. niger and A. fumigatus, but only marginally active against C. albicans; their results indicated that an antifungal activity was predominantly associated with Chlorella spp. Furthermore, several solvents were tested, but only methanolic extracts were found to possess a feasible antifungal activity.

5. Antimicroalgal action Inhibitory phenomena between microalgal cells have been reported in the past; Bagchi et al. [67] originally proposed that natural algaecides could effectively be applied in control of toxic algal blooms. However, Pratt [68] was the first to report that growth of C. vulgaris was depressed by a compound (chlorellin) that was produced and excreted into the medium – and several other extracellular metabolites able to inhibit their own growth and the growth of other species have meanwhile been reported [69]; some examples are listed in Table 4.

©FORMATEX 2011

1277

Science against microbial pathogens: communicating current research and technological advances ______________________________________________________________________________ A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.)

Table 4 Antimicroalgal features of selected compounds from microalgae.

Microalga source

Active compound

Target microorganism

Reference

Peridinium bipes

Water-soluble extract

[28,70]

Isochrysis galbana

C22H38O7 from cell-free filtrates

Microcystis aeruginosa Dunaliella salina, Platymonas elliptica, C. vulgaris, Chaetoceros muelleri, Chlorella gracilis, Nitzschia closterium, P. tricornutum

Nitzschia frustulum Scrippesiella trochoidea Prorocentrum donghaiense

-

[71]

-

Autoinhibition was also observed in H. pluvialis and S. costatum [72,73]. The antimicroalgal ability appears to derive either from interference with chlorophyll and protein syntheses [71] – as in the case of I. galbana, or because of changes in membrane permeability coupled with dissociation of phycobilin assemblages in the thylakoid membranes – thus leading to leakage across the cell wall [70]. Acknowledgements A PhD fellowship (ref. SFRH/BD/62121/2009), supervised by author F.X.M., was granted to author H.M.A., under the auspices of ESF (III Quadro Comunitário de Apoio) and the Portuguese State. A postdoctoral fellowship (ref. SFRH/BPD/72777/2010), supervised by author F.X.M., was granted to author A.C.G., also under the auspices of ESF (III Quadro Comunitário de Apoio) and the Portuguese State.

References [1] Tandeau-de-Marsac, HJ. Adaptation of cyanobacteria to environmental stimuli: new steps towards molecular mechanisms. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 1993;104:119-190. [2] Blunt JW, Copp BR, Hu WP, Munro MH, Northcote PT, Prinsep MR. Marine natural products. Natural Product Reports. 2008;25:35-94. [3] Olaizola M. Commercial development of microalgal biotechnology: from the test tube to the marketplace. Biomolecular Engineering. 2003;20:459-466. [4] Guedes AC, Amaro HM, Malcata FX. Microalgae as sources of high added-value compounds—a brief review of recent work. Biotechnology Progress. 2011;27:597-613. [5] Mendes RL, Nobre BP, Cardoso MT, Pereira AP, Palabra AF. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of compounds with pharmaceutical importance from microalgae. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 2003;356:328-334. [6] Mayer AMS, Hamann MT. Marine pharmacology in 2001–2002: marine compounds with antihelmintic, antibacterial, anticoagulant, antidiabetic, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antimalarial, antiplatelet, antiprotozoal, antituberculosis, and antiviral activities; affecting the cardiovascular, immune and nervous systems and other miscellaneous mechanisms of action. Comparative Biochemistry and Phycology, Part C. 2005;140:265-286. [7] Cardozo KHM, Guaratini T, Barros MP, Falcão VR, Tonon AP, Lopes NP, Campos S, Torres MA, Souza AO, Colepicolo P, Pinto E. Metabolites from algae with economical impact. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part C, Toxicology & Pharmacology. 2007;146:60-78. [8] Kellan SJ, Walker JM. Antibacterial activity from marine microalgae. British Journal of Phycology. 1989;23:41-44. [9] Ozemir G, Karabay NU, Dalay MC, Pazarbasi B. Antibacterial activity of volatile components and various extracts of Spirulina platensis. Phytotherapy Research. 2004;18:754-757. [10] Herrero M, Ibañez E, Cifuentes A, Reglero G, Santoyo S. Dunaliella salina microalga pressurized liquid extracts as potential antimicrobials. Journal of Food Protection. 2006;69:2471-2477. [11] Ghasemi Y, Yazdi MT, Shafiee A, Amini M, Shokravi S, Zarrini G. Parsiguine, a novel antimicrobial substance from Fischerella ambigua. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2004;42:318-322. [12] Mendiola JA, Torres CF, Martín-Alvarez PJ, Santoyo S, Toré A, Arredondo BO, Señoráns FJ, Cifuentes A, Ibáñez E. Use of supercritical CO2 to obtain extracts with antimicrobial activity from Chaetoceros muelleri microalga. A correlation with their lipidic content. European Food Research and Technology. 2007;224:505-510. [13] Metting B, Pyne JW. Biologically active compounds from microalgae. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 1986;8:386-394. [14] Tramper J, Battershill C, Brandenburg W, Burgess G, Hill R, Luiten E, Müller W, Osinga R, Rorrer G, Tredici M, Uriz M, Wright P, Wijffels R. What to do in marine biotechnology? Biomolecular Engineering. 2003;20:467-471.

1278

©FORMATEX 2011

Science against microbial pathogens: communicating current research and technological advances _______________________________________________________________________________ A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.)

[15] Trias J, Gordon EM. Innovative approaches to novel antibacterial drug discovery. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 1997;8:757-762. [16] Guedes AC, Barbosa CR, Amaro HM, Pereira CI, Malcata FX. Microalgal and cyanobacterial cell extracts for use as natural antibacterial additives against food pathogens. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2011;46:862-870. [17] Kim MK, Park JW, Park CS, Kim SJ, Jeune KH, Chang MU, Acreman J. Enhanced production of Scenedesmus spp. (green microalgae) using a new medium containing fermented swine wastewater. Bioresource Technology. 2007;98:2220-2228. [18] Sánchez F, Fernández JM., Acien FG, Rueda A, Perez-Parra J, Molina E. Influence of culture conditions on the productivity and lutein content of the new strain Scenedesmus almeriensis. Process Biochemistry. 2008;43:398-405. [19] Ghannoum MA, Rice LB. Antifungal agents: mode of action, mechanisms of resistance, and correlation of these mechanisms with bacterial resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 1999; 12:501-517. [20] Pratt R, Daniels TC, Eiler JB, Gunnison JB, Kumler WD et al. Chlorellin, an antibacterial substance from Chlorella. Science. 1944;99:351-352. [21] Desbois AP, Mearns-Spragg A, Smith VJ. A fatty acid from the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum is antibacterial against diverse bacteria including multi-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Marine Biotechnology. 2009;11:45-52. [22] Smith VJ, Desbois AP, Dyrynda EA. Conventional and unconventional antimicrobials from fish, marine invertebrates and micro-algae. Marine Drugs. 2010;8:1213-1262. [23] Jaime L, Rodríguez-Meizoso I, Cifuentes A, Santoyo S, Suarez S, Ibáñez E, Señorans FJ. Pressurized liquids as an alternative process to antioxidant carotenoids' extraction from Haematococcus pluvialis microalgae. Food Science and Technology International. 2010;43:105-112. [24] Santoyo S, Rodríguez-Meizoso I, Cifuentes A, Jaime L, García-Blairsy Reina G, Señorans FJ, Ibáñez E. Green processes based on the extraction with pressurized fluids to obtain potent antimicrobials from Haematococcus pluvialis microalgae. LWT – Food Science and Technology. 2009;42:1213-1218. [25] Naviner M, Bergé JP, Durand P, le Bris H. Antibacterial activity of the marine diatom Skeletonema costatum against aquacultural pathogens. Aquaculture. 1999;174:15-24. [26] Das BK, Pradhan J, Pattnaik P, Samantaray BR, Samal SK. Production of antibacterials from the freshwater alga Euglena viridis (Ehren). World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2005;21:45-50. [27] Terekhova VE, Aizdaicher NA, Buzoleva LS, Somov GP. Influence of extrametabolites of marine microalgae on the reproduction of the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes. Russian Journal of Marine Biology. 2009;35:355-358. [28] Bhadury P, Wright PC. Exploitation of marine algae: biogenic compounds for potential antifouling applications. Planta. 2004;219:561-578. [29] Ohta S, Chang T, Ikegami N, Kondo M, Miyata H. Antibiotic substances produced by a newly isolated marine microalga, Chlorococcum HS-101. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 1993;50:171-178. [30] Ghasemi Y, Moradian A, Mohagheghzadeh A, Shokravi S, Morowvat MH. Antifungal and antibacterial activity of the microalgae collected from paddy fields of Iran: characterization of antimicrobial activity of Chlorococcus dispersus. Journal of Biological Sciences. 2007;7:904-910. [31] Ördög V, Stirk WA, Lenobel R, Bancírová M, Strand M, van Standen J. Screening microalgae for some potentially useful agricultural and pharmaceutical secondary metabolites. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2004;16:309-314. [32] Ward OP, Singh A. Omega-3/6 fatty acids: alternative sources of production. Process Biochemistry. 2005;40:3627-3652. [33] Jüttner F. Liberation of 5,8,11,14,17-eicosapentaenoic acid and other polyunsaturated fatty acids from lipids as a grazer defense reaction in epiphithic diatom biofilms. Journal of Phycology. 2001;37:744-755. [34] d’Ippolito G, Tucci S, Cutignano A, Romano G, Cimino G, Miralto A, Fontana A. The role of complex lipids in the synthesis of bioactive aldehydes of the marine diatom Skeletonema costatum. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2004;1686:100-107. [35] Benkendorff K, Davis AR, Rogers CN, Bremner JB. Free fatty acids and sterols in the benthic spawn of aquatic molluscs, and their associated antimicrobial properties. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2005;316:29-44. [36] Borowitzka MA. Microalgae as sources of pharmaceuticals and other biologically active compounds. Journal of Applied Phycology. 1995;7:65-68. [37] Lee JB, Hayashi K, Hirata M, Kuroda E, Suzuki E, Kubo Y, Hayashi T. Antiviral sulfated polysaccharide from Navicula directa, a diatom collected from deep-sea water in Toyama Bay. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2006;29:2135-2139. [38] Yim JH, Kim SJ, Ahn SH, Lee CK, Rhie KT, Lee HK. Antiviral effects of sulfated exopolysacchride from the marine microalga Gyrodinium impudicum strain KG03. Marine Biotechnology. 2004;6:17-25. [39] Ohta S, Ono F, Shiomi Y, Nakao T, Aozasa O, Nagate T, Kitamura K, Yamaguchi S, Nishi M, Miyata H. Anti-herpes simplex virus substances produced by the marine green alga, Dunaliella primolecta. Journal of Applied Phycology. 1998;10:349-356. [40] Fábregas J, García D, Fernandez-Alonso M, Rocha AI, Gómez-Puertas P, Escribano JM, Otero A, Coll JM. In vitro inhibition of the replication of haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV) and African swine fever virus (ASFV) by extracts from marine microalgae. Antiviral Research. 1999;44:67-73. [41] Shih SR, Ho MS, Lin KH, Wu SL, Chen YT, Wu CN, Lin TY, Chang LY, Tsao KC, Ning HC, Chang PY, Jung SM, Hsueh C, Chang KS. Genetic analysis of enterovirus 71 isolated from fatal and non-fatal cases of hand, foot and mouth disease during an epidemic in Taiwan 1998. Virus Research. 2000;68:127-136. [42] Hasui M, Matsuda M, Okutani K, Shigeta S. In vitro antiviral activities of sulfated polysaccharides from a marine microalga (Cochlodinium polykrikoides) against human immunodeficiency virus and other enveloped viruses. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 1995;17:293-297. [43] Elion GB, Furman PA, Fyfe JA, de Miranda P, Beauchamp L, Schaeffer HJ. Selectivity of action of an antiherpetic agent, 9-(2hydroxyethoxymethyl) guanine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 1977;74:5716-5720. [44] Schaeffer HJ, Beauchamp L, Miranda PD, Elion GB, Bauer DJ, Collins P. 9-(2-Hydroxyethoxymethyl) guanine activity against viruses of the herpes group. Nature. 1978;272:583-585. [45] Batinic D, Robey FA. The V3 region of the enveloped glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 binds sulfated polysaccharides and CD4-derived synthetic peptides. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1992;267:6664-6671.

©FORMATEX 2011

1279

Science against microbial pathogens: communicating current research and technological advances ______________________________________________________________________________ A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.)

[46] Damonte EB, Pujol CA, Coto CE. Prospects for the therapy and prevention of Dengue virus infections. Advances in Virus Research. 2004;63:239-285. [47] Hatch M, Ehresmann D, Deig E, Wedros N. Further studies on the chemical composition and an initial in vivo evaluation of antiviral material in extracts of macroscopic algae. Journal of Phycology. 1977;13:28-35. [48] Ehresmann D, Deig EF, Hatch MT. Antiviral properties of algal polysaccharides and related compounds. In Hoppe H, Levring T, Tanaka Y. (eds). Marine Algae in Pharmaceutical Science. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin; 1979;293-302. [49] Moelling K, Schulze T, Divinger H. Inhibition of human immuno-deficiency virus type 1 RNase H by sulfated polyanions. Journal of Virology. 1989;63:5489-5491. [50] Huleihe M, Ishanu V, Tal J, Arad S. Antiviral effect of red microalgal polysaccharides on Herpes simplex and Varicella zoster viruses. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2001;13:127-134. [51] Geresh S, Arad (Malis) S. The extracellular polysaccharides of the red microalgae: chemistry and rheology. Bioresouce Technology. 1991;38:195-201. [52] Zimmerman J. Encephalomyocarditis. In Beran W, Steele H (eds.), CRC Handbook Series in Zoonoses, Section B: Viral. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL. 1994:423-436. [53] Evans L, Callow M, Percival E, Fareed V. Studies on the synthesis and composition of extracellular mucilage in the unicellular red alga Rhodella. Journal of Cell Science. 1974;16:1-21. [54] Ramus J, Robins DM. The correlation of Golgi activity and polysaccharide secretion in Porphyridium. Journal of Phycology. 1975;11:70-74. [55] Tsekos I. The sites of cellulose synthesis in algae: diversity and evolution of cellulose-synthesizing enzyme complexes. Journal of Phycology. 1999;35:635-655. [56] Keidan M, Friedlander M, Arad S. Effect of brefeldin A on cell-wall polysaccharide production in the red microalga Porphyridium sp. (Rhodophyta). Journal of Applied Phycology. 2009;21:707-717. [57] Anaissie EJ, Bodey GP. Nosocomial fungal infections – old problems and new challenges. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 1989;3:867-882. [58] Wey SB, Mori M, Pfaller M, Woolson RF, Wenzel RP. Hospital-acquired candidemia. The attributable mortality and excess length of stay. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1988;148:2642-2645. [59] Washida K, Koyama T, Yamada K, Kitab M, Uemura D. Karatungiols A and B, two novel antimicrobial polyol compounds, from the symbiotic marine dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. Tetrahedron Letters. 2006;47:2521-2525. [60] Abe M, Inoue D, Matsunaga K, Ohizumi Y, Ueda H, Asano T, Murakami M, Sato Y. Goniodomin A, an antifungal polyether macrolide, exhibits antiangiogenic activities via inhibition of actin reorganization in endothelial cells. Journal of Cell Physiology. 2002;190:109-116. [61] Nagai H, Mikami Y, Yazawa K, Gonoi T, Yasumoto T. Biological activities of novel polyether antifungals, gambieric acids A and B, from a marine dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus toxicus. Journal of Antibiotics. 1993;46:520-522. [62] Abedin RMA, Taha HM. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of cyanobacteria and green microalgae. Evaluation of medium components by Plackett-Burman design for antimicrobial activity of Spirulina platensis. Global Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 2008;3:22-31. [63] Katircioglu H, Beyatli Y, Aslim B, Yüksekdag Z, Atici T. Screening for antimicrobial agent production of some microalgae in freshwater. Internet Journal of Microbiology. 2006;2. [64] Smulders FJM, Barendsen P, van Logtestijn JG, Mossel DAA, van der Marel GM. Review: Lactic acid: considerations in favor of its acceptance as a meat decontaminant. Journal of Food Science. 1986,21:419-427. [65] Cherrington CA, Hinton M, Mead GC, Chopra I. Organic acids: chemistry, antibacterial activity, and practical applications. Advances in Microbial Physiology. 1991;32:87-95. [66] Volk RB, Furkert FH. Antialgal, antibacterial and antifungal activity of two metabolites produced and excreted by cyanobacteria during growth. Microbiological Research. 2006;161:180-186. [67] Bagchi, SN, Palod A, Chauhan VS. Algicidal properties of a bloom-forming blue-green alga, Oscillatoria sp. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 1990;30:21-29. [68] Pratt R. Studies on Chlorella vulgaris. V. Some properties of the growth-inhibitor formed by Chlorella cells. American Journal of Botany. 1942;29:142-148. [69] Hellebust JA. Extracellular products. In: Stewart WDP (ed) Algal Physiology and Biochemistry. University of California Press, Oxford, 1974;838-863. [70] Wu JT, Kuo-Huang LL, Lee J. Algicidal effect of peridinium bipes on Microcystis aeruginosa. Current Microbiology. 1998;37:257-261. [71] Yingying S, Changhai W, Jing C. Growth inhibition of eight species of microalgae by growth inhibitor from the culture of Isochrysis galbana and its isolation and identification. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2008;20:315-321. [72] Imada N, Kobayashi K, Isomura K, Saito H, Kimura S, Tahara K, Oshima Y. Isolation and identification of an autoinhibitor produced by Skeletonema costatum. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi. 1992;58:1687-1692. [73] Sun YN, Yin MY, Liu JG. Auto-signals in Haematococcus pluvialis. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology. 2001;3,22-28.

1280

©FORMATEX 2011