Keeping maintenance costs in line over the long haul

Keeping maintenance costs in line over the long haul Long-term service agreements might be the right choice for gas power plants Of special interest t...

9 downloads 582 Views 6MB Size
Keeping maintenance costs in line over the long haul Long-term service agreements might be the right choice for gas power plants Of special interest to: Chief financial officer Chief operating officer Chief risk officer Chief procurement officer Head of power generation

Long-term service agreements – a valuable proposition

LTSAs are tailored to meet the business requirements of individual customers across a range of services, which can include all aspects of gas-fired turbine support (e.g., fleet management, inventory management, repair and overhaul, provision of day-to-day technical support). LTSAs help utilities achieve more predictable maintenance and asset management costs. In addition, LTSAs can reduce total cost to own and drive up capacity factors through higher-performance parts.

Shale gas Gas plant capacity factors

Gas prices Exhibit 1 – Natural gas build-out stimulated by variety of factors As depressed natural gas prices continue to limit power prices and abundant shale gas deposits remain accessible, natural gas-fired plants are the most attractive fossil fuel for new capacity. An increasing number of utilities and independent power producers have built, or are in the process of building, new natural gas-fired power plants. As these units come on line, questions about non-fuel operations and maintenance (NFOM) costs, maintenance philosophy, and asset management trade-offs are emerging as critical risk and cost factors. Given an aging workforce in the utility sector the question of who will handle vital maintenance tasks becomes more important than ever.

2

| 5: insights for executives

Given these fundamentals, it is no surprise that there is a significant upswing in natural gas generation facilities. Coal plant retirements are at an all-time high, which amplifies natural gas plants’ growing position as both the prevailing fuel on the margin and as a vital “firming” resource for intermittent growing renewable production. Gas plant additions are dominating the market for new fossil-fired capacity.

EPA’s Clean Air Act

Macro factors

Coal plant retirements

Firming wind resources

Gas plant additions

Exhibit 2 – Natural gas-fired generation vs. other sources

Gas prices are forecast to be below $4.00 per mmBTU through 2019 and below $4.50 until 2022,2 a low level that shale gas discoveries and development efforts are expected to sustain. Low gas prices move gas-fired units up in the dispatch queue, which increases capacity factors and requires stronger plant maintenance regimes. Further, the expected impact of Section 111(d) the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Air Act is widely viewed as another stimulus for natural gas production, as the act is expected to displace coal while making gas-fired units more economically viable.

Projected US new capacity by operating date

GWs 30 Legend: Solar thermal Solar PV rooftop Onshore wind Nuclear Gas OC Gas CC Bituminous Sub-bituminous Lignite

20

10

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

Source: Composite new energy forecast from EIA, Ventyx, Bloomberg and SEIA.

What’s the issue? Attractive gas prices and increasingly stringent environmental requirements for coal units have many fleet owners considering buying or building natural gas units and/or converting existing coal units to gas. At the same time, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are contending with a relatively strong demand for new units. The increased demand for new plants impacts

1

the availability, quality and pricing for long-term maintenance options from OEMs. At the same time, owners are looking to bring maintenance costs down while optimizing operating flexibility and reliability. Most operators and their procurement teams are focused on obtaining maximum value from LTSAs and/or optimizing the in-house skill set to self-perform maintenance.

Future prices at Henry Hub, November 2014.

5: insights for executives |

3

Why now? Long-term maintenance commitments for any generating equipment are a strategic consideration and require careful, advanced deliberation as new unit contracts are negotiated. Combustion and hot gas path parts are of particular concern. They carry a high price tag stemming from the hightech, space-age technology coatings applied to withstand extreme heat exposure. These parts are frequently under patent protection, are produced in small batches and require skilled labor for installation and maintenance. Equipment availability is a critical consideration when determining a supply chain strategy for gas-fired turbines. Along with availability comes the requirement for top-notch repair facilities qualified to restore the parts removed during each maintenance event. Needless to say, a number of these parts carry price tags above $1 million, and the associated parts risk (availability, repair-ability, cycle time) must be considered when making a long-term maintenance decision. Hence, the right time to plan for long-term maintenance is now and throughout the lifetime of the asset.

How does it affect you? Given high gas plant capacity factors, maintenance needs and construction trends, the delivery of LTSAs and related services is likely to suffer. Typically, the best and brightest of the OEM’s resources are focused on new plant development. The most severe impacts of any constraints will be felt by those operators with the least contractual protection and/or those lacking the size to attract OEMs’ attention. The cost impacts from interruptions in gas turbine maintenance can be severe, ranging from cost overruns during scheduled maintenance to extended outages in cases where spare parts are not available and the turbine is idle while parts are out for repair. If precautions are not taken, disruptive events like these can seriously impact profitability.

4

| 5: insights for executives

What’s the fix? As managers continue to hone their long-term maintenance philosophy, it’s vital to clarify their in-house maintenance capabilities. On one end of the spectrum are organizations with deep gas turbine maintenance experience, a large gas turbine fleet and a well-staffed maintenance department. These organizations can realize lower costs and more effective risk management by performing gas turbine maintenance in-house. On the other end of the spectrum are generators that are new to gas turbines, have little experience with asset management and maintenance requirements, and possess a small maintenance department that is ill-equipped to perform major maintenance work on gas turbines.

The first step is a critical skills assessment to help determine the most appropriate long-term maintenance philosophy. From there, it makes sense to develop the total cost of ownership (TCO) for several long-term maintenance approaches, accounting for the various levels of risks involved in each approach. These TCO models should be updated continuously during negotiations and beyond to compare assumptions to actual performance.

A viable supplier relationship management (SRM) process involves continuous assessment and implementation of internal and external improvement opportunities. LTSAs are a strong candidate for more mature supplier partnerships due to their cost, duration and complexity. A well-run SRM process would encompass the following key elements: Exhibit 3 – LTSA SRM process Adjust LTSAs to reflect agreed-upon opportunities • Engage suppliers to test opportunity hypothesis in formal periodic meetings • Negotiate to establish cost savings and implementation plans • Adjust agreements • Develop joint implementation plans, communications plans and change management plan • Adjust savings forecast and timing of benefits

GenCo internal opportunity assessment review • Apply SRM levers to each category to identify additional opportunities • Conduct formal assessment of market dynamics and supplier costs • Conduct analysis and cost modeling of opportunities • Evaluate and prioritize opportunities • Develop list of hypothesis to test with suppliers

Establish and communicate category expectations Adjust agreements to reflect agreed-upon opportunities

Internal opportunity assessment review

Establish and communicate category expectations

Ongoing . improvement cycle

Track and measure supplier and GenCo performance

• Communicate product and service expectations internally and with suppliers • Implement service-level agreements (SLAs) that include penalties and incentives • Define and communicate supplier’s reporting requirements

Implement continuous improvement and development programs Implement improvements and supplier development programs

• Identify and implement agreed-upon changes • Own problem resolution and mitigation process

Track and measure supplier and generation fleet performance • Implement supplier scorecards to track supplier performance relative to metrics • Establish and maintain processes and tools to consistently track volume and pricing terms • Track realized benefits vs. planned

5: insights for executives |

5

What’s the bottom line? A well-developed long-term maintenance strategy can help inform decisions for years to come. As more natural gas-fired capacity comes on the market and gas prices stay at a historical low, a main differentiator for operators will be NFOM expenses. Maintenance cost is a major component of NFOM and can

6

| 5: insights for executives

be managed for cost and risk ahead of time. Large cost savings and reduced risk are the products of a well-planned and -executed maintenance philosophy.

Want to learn more? The answers in this issue are supplied by:

Mark Scherluebbe

Dana Hanson

Manager Power & Utilities Advisory, Strategy Ernst & Young LLP +1 215 448 5544 [email protected]

Power & Utilities Leader Americas Ernst & Young LLP +1 704 491 0894 [email protected]

Andrew Patterson Principal Advisory Services Ernst & Young LLP +1 404 433 4040 [email protected]

For related thought leadership, visit ey.com/5. 5: insights for executives |

7

EY | Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. Ernst & Young LLP is a client-serving member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited operating in the US. About EY’s Advisory Services Improving business performance while managing risk is an increasingly complex business challenge. Whether your focus is on broad business transformation or more specifically on achieving growth, optimizing or protecting your business having the right advisors on your side can make all the difference. Our 30,000 advisory professionals form one of the broadest global advisory networks of any professional organization, delivering seasoned multidisciplinary teams that work with our clients to deliver a powerful and exceptional client service. We use proven, integrated methodologies to help you solve your most challenging business problems, deliver a strong performance in complex market conditions and build sustainable stakeholder confidence for the longer term. We understand that you need services that are adapted to your industry issues, so we bring our broad sector experience and deep subject matter knowledge to bear in a proactive and objective way. Above all, we are committed to measuring the gains and identifying where your strategy and change initiatives are delivering the value your business needs. © 2015 Ernst & Young LLP. All Rights Reserved. SCORE No. BT0468 ED None This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice.

ey.com/5

We want to hear from you! Please let us know if there are subjects you would like 5: insights for executives to cover. You can contact us at: [email protected]