LOW BACK PAIN

Download Lampiran 1. Kuesioner Penelitian. Hubungan Faktor Resiko dengan Terjadinya Nyeri Punggung Bawah. ( Low Back Pain) Pada Tenaga Kerja Bongkar...

0 downloads 529 Views 2MB Size
Lampiran 1

Kuesioner Penelitian Hubungan Faktor Resiko dengan Terjadinya Nyeri Punggung Bawah ( Low Back Pain) Pada Tenaga Kerja Bongkar Muat (TKBM) Di Pelabuhan Belawan Medan Tahun 2015

Nomor Responden

:

I. Faktor Personal 1. Umur

:

2. BB (berat badan)

:

3. TB (tinggi badan)

:

4. IMT (Indeks Masa Tubuh)

:

5. Masa kerja

:

6. Apakah anda seorang perokok? a. Ya

b.Tidak

7. Berapa kali anda melakukan kegiatan olahraga dalam seminggu ? 1. Sering ( ≥ 3 kali sering ) 2.

Kadang ( 1- 2 kali seminggu )

3.

Jarang ( 1- 3 kali sebulan )

8. Berapa lama anda bekerja dalam satu hari ? a. ≥8 jam b. < 8

Lampiran 1

II.

Faktor pekerjaan

1. Pengukuran beban kerja Nama

Beban kerja

Ringan Sedang Berat (75 – 100 / (100 – 125 / ( 125 – 150 / menit ) menit) menit )

2. Pengukuran Sikap Kerja Dengan Metode REBA (Rapid Entry Body Assesment) Tabel A.

1. Pergerakan Leher

Skor :

Lampiran 1

2. Pergerakan Punggung

Skor :

3. Pergerakan Kaki

Skor :

Lampiran 1

Tabel. B 1. Pergerakan Lengan Atas

Skor

2. Pergerakan Lengan Bawah

Skor :

:

Lampiran 1

3. Pergerakan Pergelangan

Skor

TABEL SKOR REBA 1. Skor Tabel A

:

Lampiran 1

2. Skor Tabel B

Lampiran 1

3. Skor Tabel C

Sikap Kerja TKBM Pelabuhan Belawan

80 ◦ 12 ◦

20 ◦

40◦ 0◦

Keterangan sikap kerja : 1. Pergerakan leher 120 2. Pergerakan punggung 800 3. Pergerakan kaki 400 4. Pergerakan lengan atas 200

60 ◦

40 ◦

Keterangan sikap kerja : 1. Pergerakan punggung 600 2. Pergerakan kaki 400 3. Pergelangan lengan atas 200

80 ◦ 15 ◦

60 ◦ 15 ◦

Keterangan sikap kerja : 1. Pergerakan leher 150 2. Pergerakan punggung 800 3. Pergerakan kaki 600 4. Pergerakan lengan bawah 600 5. Pergerakan pergelangan 150

60 ◦

MASTER DATA HUBUNGAN FAKTOR RESIKO DENGAN TERJADINYA NYERI PUNGGUNG BAWAH ( LOW BACK PAIN ) PADA TENAGA KERJA BONGKAR MUAT ( TKBM ) DI PELABUHAN BELAWAN TAHUN 2015

No . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Case control 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Umur Umurk 34 36 27 24 23 24 40 24 50 23 24 24 30 50 24 52 52 49 22

2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1

BB

TB

IMT

IMTK

Masa

Masak

Rokok

Olahraga

Lama

denyutseb

70 68 68 60 68 68 60 58 60 60 80 58 54 63 67 58 60 57 51

167 176 170 183 173 165 160 162 165 180 180 160 166 160 175 162 163 167 166

25 22 24 18 23 25 23 22 22 19 25 23 20 25 22 22 23 20 19

2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

6 5 2 2 5 5 6 5 15 5 5 6 2 10 6 16 21 14 3

2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1

2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1

1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1

93 92 83 98 88 82 96 83 81 91 85 91 81 92 84 84 94 86 82

denyutses beban 119 109 108 124 115 118 119 107 116 118 119 116 98 119 119 117 116 117 98

2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1

sikap 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

27 28 24 24 23 33 40 24 37 39 26 35 24 24 36 29 24 21 53 24 23 23 23 24 19 23 24

2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

55 78 60 60 51 59 68 60 62 57 53 59 67 65 64 50 60 65 68 63 58 61 61 52 60 53 51

165 190 160 180 165 165 165 165 166 165 165 164 166 163 170 165 170 170 170 160 162 164 173 167 160 165 160

20 22 23 19 19 22 25 22 22 21 19 22 24 24 22 18 21 22 24 24 22 23 20 19 23 19 20

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2 3 6 5 5 10 12 6 9 15 3 7 6 5 9 8 6 2 30 6 5 2 5 6 2 3 6

1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2

80 85 84 92 95 83 94 90 92 99 82 94 89 95 83 85 88 82 84 82 85 82 82 91 84 82 92

98 115 132 114 136 131 107 131 109 105 116 132 130 116 118 93 132 98 131 132 132 100 131 118 110 116 131

1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2

2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

37 23 24 23 50 26 23 29 24 22 24 22 21 23 24 22 23 26

2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2

65 52 60 56 50 50 60 65 54 53 52 56 50 58 58 59 60 49

170 170 163 165 163 161 160 160 170 168 169 170 170 163 160 170 172 162

22 18 23 21 19 19 20 23 22 19 19 18 19 19 23 20 20 19

2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2

8 5 5 5 15 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 1 1 3 2

2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2

1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

80 93 83 80 78 83 81 84 62 80 75 80 80 81 83 85 82 85

131 119 119 92 110 110 100 90 91 90 84 97 81 98 108 99 118 119

2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2

2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2

Umur TKBM * Low Back Pain Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Umurk * Low Back Pain

Missing

Percent 64

N

54.2%

Total

Percent 54

N

45.8%

118

Umurk * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation Low Back Pain Case Umurk

1

2

Total

Count

Control 24

38

% within Umurk

36.8%

63.2%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

43.8%

75.0%

59.4%

% of Total

21.9%

37.5%

59.4%

18

8

26

% within Umurk

69.2%

30.8%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

56.2%

25.0%

40.6%

% of Total

28.1%

12.5%

40.6%

32

32

64

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

Count % within Umurk % within Low Back Pain % of Total

Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Odds Ratio for Umurk (1 / 2) For cohort Low Back Pain = Case

Total

14

Count

Lower

Upper

.259

.090

.750

.532

.326

.868

Percent 100.0%

For cohort Low Back Pain =

2.053

Control N of Valid Cases

1.098

3.837

64

IMT TKBM * Low Back Pain

Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N IMTK * Low Back Pain

Missing

Percent 64

N

Total

Percent

54.2%

54

N

45.8%

Percent 118

IMTK * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation Low Back Pain Case IMTK

< 18.4

Count

Total

Total

1

3

4

25.0%

75.0%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

3.1%

9.4%

6.2%

% of Total

1.6%

4.7%

6.2%

31

29

60

% within IMTK

51.7%

48.3%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

96.9%

90.6%

93.8%

% of Total

48.4%

45.3%

93.8%

32

32

64

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

% within IMTK

18.5 - 25.0

Control

Count

Count % within IMTK % within Low Back Pain % of Total

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction

Df

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

a

1

.302

.267

1

.606

1.113

1

.291

1.067 b

Likelihood Ratio

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association

1.050

N of Valid Cases

c

1

.306

Point Probability

.613

.306

.613

.306

.613

.306

.613

.306

64

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table c. The standardized statistic is -1.025.

Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Odds Ratio for IMTK (< 18.4 / 18.5 - 25.0) For cohort Low Back Pain = Case For cohort Low Back Pain = Control N of Valid Cases

Lower

Upper

.312

.031

3.170

.484

.087

2.689

1.552

.832

2.894

64

Masa Kerja TKBM *Low Back Pain Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Masak * Low Back Pain

Missing

Percent 64

54.2%

N

Total

Percent 54

45.8%

N

Percent 118

100.0%

.250

Masak * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation Low Back Pain Case Masak

<4

>4

Total

Count

Control

Total

7

17

24

% within Masak

29.2%

70.8%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

21.9%

53.1%

37.5%

% of Total

10.9%

26.6%

37.5%

25

15

40

% within Masak

62.5%

37.5%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

78.1%

46.9%

62.5%

% of Total

39.1%

23.4%

62.5%

32

32

64

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

Count

Count % within Masak % within Low Back Pain % of Total

Chi-Square Tests

Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction

Df

Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

a

1

.010

5.400

1

.020

6.823

1

.009

6.667 b

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association

6.562

N of Valid Cases

c

1

.010

64

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table c. The standardized statistic is -2.562.

Point Probability

.019

.010

.019

.010

.019

.010

.019

.010

.008

Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Odds Ratio for Masak (<4 / >4) For cohort Low Back Pain = Case For cohort Low Back Pain = Control

Lower

Upper

.247

.083

.734

.467

.239

.910

1.889

1.174

3.038

N of Valid Cases

64

Kebiasaan Merokok TKBM * Low Back Pain Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Rokok * Low Back Pain

Missing

Percent 64

N

54.2%

Total

Percent 54

N

45.8%

118

Rokok * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation Low Back Pain Case Rokok

Ya

Tidak

Count

Control

Total

28

29

57

% within Rokok

49.1%

50.9%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

87.5%

90.6%

89.1%

% of Total

43.8%

45.3%

89.1%

4

3

7

% within Rokok

57.1%

42.9%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

12.5%

9.4%

10.9%

6.2%

4.7%

10.9%

Count

% of Total

Percent 100.0%

Total

Count

32

32

64

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

% within Rokok % within Low Back Pain % of Total

Chi-Square Tests

Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction

Df

Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

a

1

.689

.000

1

1.000

.161

1

.688

.160 b

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association

.158

N of Valid Cases

c

1

.691

1.000

.500

1.000

.500

1.000

.500

1.000

.500

64

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table c. The standardized statistic is -.397.

Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Odds Ratio for Rokok (Ya / Tidak) For cohort Low Back Pain = Case For cohort Low Back Pain = Control N of Valid Cases

Lower

Upper

.724

.148

3.531

.860

.430

1.720

1.187

.486

2.898

64

Point Probability

.287

Kebiasaan Olahraga TKBM * Low Back Pain Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Olahraga * Low Back Pain

Missing

Percent 64

N

54.2%

Total

Percent 54

N

45.8%

Percent 118

Olahraga * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation Low Back Pain Case Olahraga

Sering

Jarang

Total

Count

Control

Total

14

24

38

% within Olahraga

36.8%

63.2%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

43.8%

75.0%

59.4%

% of Total

21.9%

37.5%

59.4%

18

8

26

% within Olahraga

69.2%

30.8%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

56.2%

25.0%

40.6%

% of Total

28.1%

12.5%

40.6%

32

32

64

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

Count

Count % within Olahraga % within Low Back Pain % of Total

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction

Df

Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

a

1

.011

5.247

1

.022

6.610

1

.010

6.478 b

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association

6.377

N of Valid Cases

c

1

.012

.021

.011

.021

.011

.021

.011

.021

.011

64

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table c. The standardized statistic is -2.525.

Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Odds Ratio for Olahraga (Sering / Jarang) For cohort Low Back Pain = Case For cohort Low Back Pain = Control N of Valid Cases

Lower

Upper

.259

.090

.750

.532

.326

.868

2.053

1.098

3.837

64

Point Probability

.008

Lama Kerja TKBM * Low Back Pain

Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Lama * Low Back Pain

Missing

Percent 64

54.2%

N

Total

Percent 54

N

45.8%

Percent 118

100.0%

Lama * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation Low Back Pain Case Lama

< 8 jam

Count

Total

Total

3

2

5

60.0%

40.0%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

9.4%

6.2%

7.8%

% of Total

4.7%

3.1%

7.8%

29

30

59

% within Lama

49.2%

50.8%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

90.6%

93.8%

92.2%

% of Total

45.3%

46.9%

92.2%

32

32

64

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

% within Lama

> 8 jam

Control

Count

Count % within Lama % within Low Back Pain % of Total

Chi-Square Tests

Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

df a

1

.641

.000

1

1.000

.218

1

.640

.217 b

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

.214

c

1

.644

Point Probability

1.000

.500

1.000

.500

1.000

.500

1.000

.500

.323

64

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table c. The standardized statistic is .462.

Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Odds Ratio for Lama (< 8 jam / > 8 jam) For cohort Low Back Pain = Case

Lower

Upper

1.552

.241

9.974

1.221

.570

2.614

.787

.261

2.369

For cohort Low Back Pain = Control N of Valid Cases

64

Beban Kerja TKBM *Low Back Pain Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N bebankerja * Low Back Pain

Missing

Percent 64

54.2%

N

Total

Percent 54

45.8%

N

Percent 118

100.0%

bebankerja * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation Low Back Pain Case bebankerja

Ringan

Count

Sedang

Total

9

18

27

% within bebankerja

33.3%

66.7%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

28.1%

56.2%

42.2%

% of Total

14.1%

28.1%

42.2%

23

14

37

% within bebankerja

62.2%

37.8%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

71.9%

43.8%

57.8%

% of Total

35.9%

21.9%

57.8%

32

32

64

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

Count

Total

Control

Count % within bebankerja % within Low Back Pain % of Total

Chi-Square Tests

Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction

Df

Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

a

1

.023

4.100

1

.043

5.269

1

.022

5.189 b

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association

5.108

N of Valid Cases

c

1

.024

64

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table c. The standardized statistic is -2.260.

Point Probability

.042

.021

.042

.021

.042

.021

.042

.021

.016

Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Odds Ratio for bebankerja (Ringan / sedang) For cohort Low Back Pain = Case For cohort Low Back Pain = Control

Lower

Upper

.304

.108

.861

.536

.297

.967

1.762

1.078

2.881

N of Valid Cases

64

Sikap Kerja TKBM * Low Back Pain Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Sikap * Low Back Pain

Missing

Percent 64

N

54.2%

Total

Percent 54

N

45.8%

Percent 118

Sikap * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation Low Back Pain Case Sikap

sedang

tinggi

Count

Control

Total

15

24

39

% within Sikap

38.5%

61.5%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

46.9%

75.0%

60.9%

% of Total

23.4%

37.5%

60.9%

17

8

25

% within Sikap

68.0%

32.0%

100.0%

% within Low Back Pain

53.1%

25.0%

39.1%

Count

100.0%

% of Total Total

26.6%

12.5%

39.1%

32

32

64

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

Count % within Sikap % within Low Back Pain % of Total

Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Odds Ratio for Sikap (sedang / tinggi) For cohort Low Back Pain = Case For cohort Low Back Pain = Control N of Valid Cases

Lower

Upper

.294

.102

.848

.566

.350

.914

1.923

1.031

3.585

64

Dokumentasi Penelitian