M7: Improving Clinical Flow ECHO - IHI Home Page

4.20.17 The presenters have nothing to disclose. M7: Improving Clinical Flow ECHO Kristin Batts June Gillespie Elizabeth Clewett Roger Chaufournier...

8 downloads 499 Views 4MB Size
The presenters have nothing to disclose.

M7: Improving Clinical Flow ECHO Kristin Batts June Gillespie Elizabeth Clewett Roger Chaufournier Kathy Reims

4.20.17

Overview of the Session • Journey of an organization to improve efficiencies of care • Change package and measures to improve clinical flow • Project ECHO clinic simulation • Alien abduction exercise

Table Introductions • Name • Organization • One thing you hope to learn • Report out themes of desired learning

The presenters have nothing to disclose.

Improving Clinical Flow ECHO: Cherry Health Kristin Batts, LMSW, HOTC Adult Site Manager June Gillespie, RN BSN, Echo Project Manager

4.20.17

7

“Before”- Why Project ECHO? • Agency committed to Triple Aim Improved Population Health Improved Patient Experience Reduced Health Systems Cost

• Chris Shea, CEO, saw Project ECHO as opportunity to answer question: How can we make systems more efficient so we can see more patients in cost effective way?

• Video Vignette

8

3 Cherry Health Sites chosen • Westside- largest Family Practice site • 4.5 Provider FTE Family Practice (excluding PEDS), • ~5800 Patient panel

• Cherry Street- 2nd largest Family practice site • 4.3 Provider FTE Family Practice (including PEDS) • ~5700 Patient panel

• HOTC Adult- Internal Medicine, Strong interest in Quality Improvement. • 3.6 Provider FTE • ~2900 Patient panel

Improving Clinical Flow Driver diagram Change Package Roger Chaufournier Kathy Reims

Improving Flow: an IHI Quality Improvement and Project ECHO Collaborative Primary Drivers

Engaged Leadership

Change Concepts Devel op culture for transformation

Lead collective understanding of business case

Assure s ustainable change

Quality Improvement Strategy

Aim: Create clinic work environment that supports:

Objectives: 1.meeting patient care needs 2.joy in work* 3. optimization of resources

Use a formal model

Establish/monitor metrics Assign patients to provider panel

Empanelment

Assess suppl y and demand

Optimize the Care Team

By: 7/31/2016

Use panel s and registries proactively

Provide organizational support

Manage patient expectations of care

Function at top of skills

Ensure patients s ee their as signed prov ider

Enable independent work

Create standard work

Manage pan el Organized RelationshipBased Care

Identi fy and remove waste Improve work flow

Listen to customers Patients as Partners

Outcome M easures

Process Measures

1. % state, ”I get what I want and need when I want and need it.”

1. % state, “Does not waste my time.”

2. % seen by PC P

2. % empaneled

3. % No Shows * as ses sment in pre-work/end

3. average cycle ti me minutes

Provide care in context of “what matters” to pt

Balance Measures

Leadership M easures

1. % colorectal cancer screening

1. % visits per Provider FTE

2.% DM in contro l (A1c >9)

2. cost per patient visit

3. % pers istent asthma o n controller 4. # of days to 3rd next available

3. net margin

11

Engaged Leadership

12

Quality Improvement Strategy

13

Empanelment

14

Optimize the Care Team

16

Organized, Relationship-based Care

17

21

Building Blocks Exercise • Instructions • End Goal: Construct a visual structure for health center change. • Each block must be labeled with a word from the Driver Diagram handout • Use the dry erase marker to label blocks • Be prepared to explain the rationale for your design

22

An Overview of Project ECHO® (Extension for Community Health Outcomes)

Presented at the 18th Annual Summit on Improving Patient Care in the Office Practice and the Community: IHI Summit Elizabeth Clewett, PhD, MBA

Path for this Conversation

• What is the ECHO model • How was it used for this project? • How to connect to an ECHO project near you

At ECHO, our mission is to democratize medical knowledge and get best practice care to underserved people all over the world. Our goal is to touch the lives of 1 billion people by 2025. Supported by New Mexico Department of Health, Agency for Health Research and Quality, New Mexico Legislature, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the GE Foundation and Helmsley Charitable Trust

Problem (2003): 8 month wait in clinic to be treated for Hepatitis C Estimated 28,000 in NM with Hep C

In 2004 less than 5% had been treated No primary care physicians in the state would treat due to complex treatment with serious potential side effects Few specialists available to see Hep C patients Photo: Dr. Sanjeev Arora, Director and Founder of Project ECHO and the GI clinic at the University of New Mexico

Goal: A system that would • Develop capacity to safely and effectively treat HCV in all areas of New Mexico and to monitor outcomes.

• Develop a model to treat complex diseases in rural locations and developing countries cost-effective way

Copyright 2015 Project ECHO®

Solution: ECHO Model – four pillars Use Technology to leverage scarce resources

Sharing “best practices” to reduce disparities Case based learning to master complexity Web-based database to monitor outcomes Copyright 2015 Project ECHO

ECHO Applies Adult Learning Theory  Adults will learn only what they need to learn  Their learning is primarily problem-based rather than subject-based  They have a rich reservoir of experience to apply to their learning  They learn best in informal settings

 They want guidance rather than instruction

Disease Selection Common diseases Management is complex Evolving treatments and medicines High societal impact (health and economic) Serious outcomes of untreated disease

Improved outcomes with disease management Copyright 2015 Project ECHO®

Successful Expansion into Multiple Diseases Mon

Tue

Wed

Thurs

Fri

Hepatitis C

Namibia HIV

IHS Navajo HIV

Hepatitis C in Prisons

Nurse Practitioners

• Arora • Thornton Rheumatology

• Struminger

• Iandiorio

Endocrinology & Diabetes

• Bankhurst

Partners in Good Health and Wellness

• Thornton Chronic Pain and Headache • Shelley

HIV

• Struminger Bone Health

• Bouchonville

• Van Roper Integrated Addictions and Psychiatry

• Iandiorio

• Liewicki

Improving Clinical Flow • IHI

Complex Care

Prison Peer Educator Training

Crisis Intervention for Community Policing Agencies • Duhigg Epilepsy

• Komaromy Tuberculosis

• Komaromy

• Thornton

• Immerman Copyright 2016 Project ECHO®

Cardiology

• Struminger

ECHO Replication Sites Worldwide:

Part 2: IHI-PROJECT ECHO COLLABORATIVE Goal: To test whether the ECHO model can be used to support training for quality improvement and complex systems redesign.

Clinical Flow in Primary Care Clinics Focus

Effective and efficient Use of Provider Time Optimizing Care Teams Patient and Staff Satisfaction Empanelment and Managing Case Loads

Removing waste Using Data to Drive Changes Spreading and Integrating Changes Over Time

Developing a Business Case for Changes

Overview of Project Pre-work-organize improvement team + baseline assessment Face to Face Learning Session 2 Virtual Learning Session Monthly Data reporting Monthly Leadership Calls Weekly 2 hour teleECHO Clinics (10/22/15)

Video-conferencing Platform Case based learning

Participants: 15 community clinics 1 year, 10 continued for additional 6 months

Represent 7 CHCs 15 FQHCs, Serving 134,061 Patients

systems with a total of 68 FQHCs

40

Learning Session 1: Face to Face

Provider Cup full

Exercise: distribution of tasks in the clinic

RN, MA, front desk cups often low

41

Anatomy of our weekly TeleECHO Clinic Sessions Introductions Case Presentation #1 by clinic team (30-40 minutes) Clarifying questions (clinics, faculty) Recommendations (round robin of teams) Presenting team tells group what suggestions they are most likely to implement Didactic (20-30 minutes) Interactive

Case Presentation #2 (30-40 minutes) Clarifying questions (clinics, faculty) Recommendations (round robin of teams if time) Summary of discussion 5 minutes to fill out weekly survey Post Clinic: recommendations sent to each presenting team

Data Transparency: key indicators shown regularly during case presentations and displayed in clinics

Measures—tracked at least monthly

Outcome

Process

Balance

1. Continuity

1.Empanelment

1.Colorectal screening

2. No shows

2. Cycle time

2.% DM in control (A1c >9)

3.Patient experience

3. % patients who say does not waste my time

3. % persistent asthma on controller 4. # of days to 3rd next available

Red indicates areas of overall improvement for participating sites

Increase in Colorectal Screening: Possible Reasons Why (Average from 31% to 41% over 18 months)

Greater awareness of data—shown each week in case templates. 1. Focus over 18 months on empanelment, care team coordination creating better relationship with patients

3. QI skills of PDSA testing, process mapping, and using data to refine systems of patient outreach and follow up 4. Copycat Effect: As saw teams focused on colorectal screening, focused didactics to use colo-rectal screening as an example for variety of topics, including engaging patients, developing a business case etc..

Some lessons learned Weekly rhythm of teleECHO sessions helped drive quality improvement work into the daily and weekly workflow. Making data visible: Embedding data (run charts) in weekly case templates helped create a culture of data transparency QI skills (PDSA rapid cycle testing, process mapping etc..) seem to have become more embedded in work of staff. Peer Learning: Importance of learning from other teams, hearing their struggles and what had tried

Overall 1. We believe ECHO is useful for QI learning and creating communities of QI learners (still in testing phase) Next wave of testers: HealthInsight, QIOs, and NY State Dept of Health

2. We hypothesize that the ECHO model will provide a dramatically more efficient, cost-effective, and engaging way to teach QI methods to teams spread across large distances, compared to traditional collaborative and webinar models of learning 3. Joy of work: Well run ECHO projects create communities of practice where participants want to come because they feel connected, engaged, and part of the community (not unusual to hear ‘this is the best hour of my week) 4. Promote a culture of continual learning: ECHO projects create learning loops where participants who like on-going learning thrive.

How to Join an ECHO project near you Go to http://echo.unm.edu/ Join an ECHO

Moving Knowledge Instead of Patients

50

ECHO Clinic

51

HOTC Adult Presentation • Order Follow-up • Update since presentation: • Process map done for Referral tracking • Identified Gap in obtaining Scheduled date of referral/ diagnostic test (Still working on filling that gap) • Have begun reporting % Completed for Diagnostic Tests and Referrals by Site and PCP monthly • Working with Specialists- new relationships and opportunities for uninsured patients

52

‘After’ Project ECHO • Video Vignette • Continuing to use principles learned to test new Operational processes and new ideas • Have a “ECHO Planning” Team that approves ‘new’ change ideas for testing. (Changes that may benefit multiple sites/programs, tie to Operational Plan, have baseline data and reasonable expectation of success

53

Dashboard HOTC Adult (Kristin) ECHO Dashboard for Cherry_Heart as of January 21, 2017 100

Percent

60 40 20 0

5 0

40

20 0

1000

100

600 400

# of Visits

120

800

80 60 40 20

200 0

0

Percent

8. DM Not In Control (>9) 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

# of Patients

Percent

7. Colorectal Cancer Screening 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

25

600

20

500 300

10

200

5

100

0

0

Days

10. Third Next Available Appointment 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

# of Patients

Percent

400

15

9. Persistent Asthma on Controller 102 100 98 96 94 92 90 88 86 84

16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0

6. Percentage Empaneled 1200

Percent

Minutes

5. Cycle Time 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

# of Surveys

10

60

70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

# of Patients

15

80

Percent

20

100

# of Appointments

25

Percent

4. Does Not Waste My Time 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

# of Patients

3. No Show Percentage 30

1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

80

# of Visits

2. Continuity to PCP or Care Team 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

# of Surveys

Percent

1. Patient/Family Experience 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

54

Alien Abduction Table Exercise

55

[email protected]