SCHOOL REPORT CARD - Antonio M. Serapio Elementary School

5th Place Pagwawasto at Pag-uulo ng Balita Journalism District Student 3rd Place Editorial Writing Journalism District Student ... SCHOOL REPORT CARD...

7 downloads 571 Views 1MB Size
SCHOOL REPORT CARD 1st Quarter, SY 2016-2017

Antonio M. Serapio Elementary School C. De Leon St., Ugong, Valenzuela City

School Profile 1. Enrollment Enrollment by Gender 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

Male Female

SY 2014-2015

SY 2015-2016

SY 2016-2017

From SY 2014-2015 enrolment, both the number of male and female enrolees has increased.

2. Health and nutritional status Number of learners by health status, SY 20162017 1000 800

Kinder to Grade 3 10

15

3

12 4

600

400

760

200 0 Male

720 21 16

Severly Wasted

Grades 4 - 6 32

541

20 12 Female Wasted

24

Normal

Male

520 9 8

Overweight

6 11 Female Obese

3. Learner’s materials

Textbooks

Subject

Number

Excess

Shortage

Math 1

80

None

269

Math 2

82

None

179

Math 3

83

None

288

Math 4

169

None

185

Math 5

319

None

21

Science 4

123

None

231

Science 5

36

None

304

Reading 1

262

None

87

Reading 2

20

None

341

Reading 3

64

None

307

Reading 4

169

None

185

Reading 5

145

None

195

Reading 6

104

None

125

Language 3

84

None

287

Language 4

105

None

249

Language 5

202

None

138

3. Learner’s materials (con’t)

Textbooks

Subject

Number

Excess

Shortage

Language 6

108

None

121

Filipino 3

130

None

241

Filipino 4

240

None

114

Filipino 5

135

None

205

Filipino 6

122

None

107

Wika 3

42

None

329

Wika 4

305

None

48

Wika 5

165

None

175

Wika 6

143

None

86

HEKASI 1

41

None

308

HEKASI 2

62

None

299

HEKASI 3

78

None

293

HEKASI 4

300

None

54

HEKASI 5

257

None

83

HEKASI 6

68

None

161

3. Learner’s materials (con’t) Number Library

Computer Laboratory

Science Laboratory

Books

NA

Tables

NA

Chairs

Na

Computers

2 CPUs, 24 Monitors with peripherals

Tables

6

Chairs

24

Science Equipment

NA

4. Teachers’ Professional Development 60 50 40

30 20 10 0 ICT

PLC

K-12

SBM

GAD

Others

5. Funding Sources Sources of School Funding, SY 2016 - 2017 4% 1%

34%

28%

11% 22%

MOOE Canteen Fund LGUs PTA Donors Others

6. School awards and recognition Title of Award

Award Giving

Level

Category of Awardees

2nd Place Poster Making

Science Fair

District

Student

5th Place Pagwawasto at Pag-uulo ng Balita

Journalism

District

Student

3rd Place Editorial Writing

Journalism

District

Student

5th Place Featured Writing

Journalism

District

Student

Singing Contest 2nd Place

Silvestre E/S

District

Student

Singing Contest Duo 3rd Place

Silvestre E/S

District

Non-Teaching

Crafting E – Modules in Filipino 4th Place

City Library Hub

Division

Teacher

Division Caravan of Best Practices in Filipino

Antonio M. Serapio

Division

Student

SIM – Grade 5

Science Quest

Division

Teacher

Performance Indicators: Access 7. Number and rate of dropouts by cause Number of drop out by cause 30 25 Armed Conflict

20

Family Problem

15

Lack of Allowance Distance to School

10

Sickness

5 0

SY 2014- SY 20152015 2016

The dropout rate of the school was decreased by 0.21% from 1.23% in SY 2014 – 2015 to 1.02% of SY 2015-2016. In SY 20142015, the main cause of dropping out was family problem. While the distance to school was the main cause of dropping out of the pupils for SY 2015-2016

Performance Indicators: Quality 8. Percentage of learners who completed the School Year (Promotion Rate) The promotion rate caries across grade levels. It shows that pupils from Grade 3 has the lowest promotion rate with 93.26%. However, majority of the Grade Levels have high promotion rate. The school has an average of 97.77% promotion rate.

Promotion Rate 102.00% 100.00% 98.00% 96.00% 94.00% 92.00% 90.00% 88.00%

100.00%

Kinder

96.28%

97.78%

Grade 1

Grade 2

99.44%

99.41%

Grade 4

Grade 5

93.26% Grade 3

Promotion Rate

Performance Indicators: Quality 9. National Achievement Test (NAT) – by (MPS) 65 60 55 50 45

Mathematics

Filipino

Aral. Pan.

Science

English

Overall

NAT 6

In the recent NAT, students performed well in Filipino with 60.94%. However, there would be intervening programs to be implemented on teaching-learning process to help the pupils in the remaining learning areas. The school has an over-all MPS of 56.55

10. Literacy Level PHIL-IRI results show improvements in the students’ literacy. More students have moved from frustration level to instructional level in both English and Filipino.

1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

English 193

Filipino 447

309

550

530

802

905

766

670

380 Pre test

241

Post test

Frustration

483

Pre test Instructional

Independent

Post test

Performance Indicators: Governance 11. School-Based Management Assesment Level SBM Level

1

Qualitative Interpretation

Developing

12. Child-Friendly School Survey result CFSS Points:

Qualitative Interpretation

26

Child Friendly

The school got a score of 26 points in the Child-friendly school survey, making us Child-Friendly School.

13. Stakeholder’s participation Stakeholders have shown notable participation in the numerous undertakings of the school. Stakeholders’ Attendance to School Activites, SY 2015- 2016

92% 90%

88%

Stakeholders Contribution, SY 2015-2016 Cash/Inkind

300000.00

90%

250000.00

89%

88%

150000.00

85%

100000.00

84%

50000.00 Co-Curricular Activities

Extra Curricular Activities

Meetings

Assemblies

Number of volunteer hours

70

64

60 50 40

36

30

20

20

10

10 0

200000.00

200000.00

86% 82%

256000.00

Brigada

Contests

Scouting

Closing Program

5 Others

0.00

Brigada

5000.00

6000.00

Contests

Scouting

1000.00 Closing Program

Others

14. Learner-Teacher ratio Learner-Teacher Ratio, SY 20162017 60 50 40

30 20 10 0

51.8

41.8

44.4

41

Grade 1

Grade 2

Grade 3

45.25

50

28.42

Kinder

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

15. Learner-Classroom ratio Learner-Classroom, SY 2016-2017 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

46.44

44.44

45.55

Grade 1

Grade 2

Grade 3

51.8

51.7

50

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

28.42

Kinder

16. Learner-Toilet ration Learner-Toilet Ratio, SY 2016-2017

80 There are insufficient toilets to accommodate all students. Based on the number of students assigned to a toilet, it doesn’t meet the recommended learnertoilet ratio.

70 60 50 40 30

20 10 0 per/toilet

17. Learner-Seat ratio Learner- Seat Ratio, SY 20162017

1.2 There are currently enough seats for all our students

1

0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2

0 per/toilet