Syndromic Surveillance Meaningful Use Recommendations

Meaningful Use Recommendations. November 16, 2011. Taha A. Kass- Hout, MD, MS. Deputy Director for Information Science and BioSense Program Manager...

6 downloads 525 Views 1MB Size
Syndromic Surveillance Meaningful Use Recommendations November 16, 2011

Taha A. Kass-Hout, MD, MS Deputy Director for Information Science and BioSense Program Manager Division of Notifiable Diseases and Healthcare Information (DNDHI, Proposed) Public Health Surveillance Program Office (PHSPO) Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (OSELS) Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)

Any views or opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC, HHS, or any other entity of the United States government. Furthermore, the use of any product names, trade names, images, or commercial sources is for identification purposes only, and does not imply endorsement or government sanction by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services Public Health Surveillance Program Office

Background

CDC AND ISDS MEANINGFUL USE RECOMMENDATIONS

CMS EHR Incentive Programs “Meaningful Use”

Stage 2 Advanced clinical Stage 1 processes Data capture (2013-2014) and sharing (2011-2012)

Stage 3 Improved outcomes (2015-2016)

Meaningful Use Rules in July 2010

?

?

?

Development Process

THE RECOMMENDATION

CDC and ISDS Recommendation 

Responded to needs for    



Clarity in the MUse rule for Syndromic Surveillance Support PHA’s participation in MUse Contemporary picture of practice A minimum (core and optional) standard

Is based on  Best practices  Core business needs



Establishes a foundation

          

Michael A. Coletta, MPH (Workgroup Chair), Virginia Department of Health Ryan Gentry, Indiana State Department of Health Julia E. Gunn, RN, MPH, Boston Public Health Commission Richard S. Hopkins, MD, MSPH, Florida Department of Health Amy Ising, MSIS, University of North Carolina Department of Emergency Medicine at Chapel Hill Geraldine S. Johnson, MS, New York State Department of Health Bryant T. Karras, MD, State of Washington, Department of Health Karl Soetebier, Georgia Department of Community Health David Swenson, MEd, State of New Hampshire, Department of Public Health Services David Buckeridge, MD, PhD, McGill University and Montreal Public Health Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Science and Career Development, CDC  Public Health Surveillance Program Office  Partnerships and Planning Activity: Pamela A. Meyer, PhD, MSPH  Division of Healthcare Information: Samuel Groseclose, DVM, MPH; Taha Kass-Hout, MD, MS  Public Health Informatics and Technology Program Office:  Standards and Inoperability: Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, MBA  Northrop Grumman: Sergei Li, PMP; Sundak Ganesan, MD; Mark Meadows; Adam Browning; Mary Hamilton

AHIC Biosurveillance MDS

NHIN Biosurveillance UC

HITSP Biosurveillance Interoperability Specification [20081218 V3.2]

Current SS Landscape •Distribute [40 jurisdictions] •BioSense [28 jurisdictions]

Draft Minimum Data Set

Consensus-driven Development

1. ISDS MU Workgroup informed early iterations. SME’s included representation from CSTE, and NACCHO 2. Stakeholder input help validate, refine and better contextualized the recommendations 3. 41 stakeholders commented; ~ 20% corporations or professional organizations •

4 EP’s or Hospital



9 Vendors



20 Public Health



2 Other

Contents

THE RECOMMENDATION

Scope Data Source: Data on emergency department (ED) and urgent care (UC) patient visits captured by health information system and sent to a public health authority defines the scope of this recommendation. Surveillance Goal: Assessment of community and population health for all-hazards defines the scope of this recommendation. Message and Vocabulary Standards: Standards that support current and continued PHSS improvements, while maintaining consistency with those standards required by the CMS EHR Reimbursement Program define the scope of this recommendation

Meaningful Use Rules in July 2010

?

?

?

Meaningful Use Rules in October 2011 33 Elements 17 Core 16 Optional

3 Core Business Processes Performing Syndrome-based Surveillance

Establishing New Data Source

Monitoring Data Quality

NOW AVAILABLE PHIN Guide for SS : ED & UC Data, Release 1.0

Revised and improved • Based on feedback through Federal Registry post 5/11-6/11 • Better suit the intent of Meaningful Use policy • Added FAQ to address specific issues and needs for clarification

Highlight changes • Data Elements of Interest – Usage • 17 required (R or RE) • 16 optional (O)

• Data Elements of Interest – Vocabulary • Treatment Facility ID • Race, Ethnicity, Gender

• Extended data elements • Increased guidance

• Business rules • Transmission and updating

http://www.cdc.gov/EHRmeaningfuluse/Syndromic.html

Continuing work on PHSS Meaningful Use Develop business and infrastructure requirements for syndromic surveillance using • Inpatient care data • Ambulatory care data (EP’s)



Thank You!

Taha A. Kass-Hout, MD, MS Deputy Director for Information Science and BioSense Program Manager Division of Notifiable Diseases and Healthcare Information (DNDHI, Proposed) Public Health Surveillance Program Office (PHSPO) Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (OSELS) Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)

Any views or opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC, HHS, or any other entity of the United States government. Furthermore, the use of any product names, trade names, images, or commercial sources is for identification purposes only, and does not imply endorsement or government sanction by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.