TABLE OF CONTENTS - Primex

2 1. AN INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT IN PHYSICAL SCIENCES Physical Sciences focuses on investigating physical and chemical phenomena through scientific ...

18 downloads 637 Views 443KB Size
Siyasebenzisana  Working Together  Samewerking

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. An introduction to Assessment in Physical Sciences 2. Continuous Assessment 2.1 2.2 2.2.1 2.2.2

Daily Assessment in Physical Sciences Programme of Assessment Programme of Assessment in Grades 10 and 11 Programme of Assessment in Grade 12

3. Moderation of the Assessment Tasks 4. Appendices 4.1

Physical Sciences Evidence of Learner Performance cover –Grade 10/11 4.2 Physical Sciences Evidence of Learner Performance cover – Grade 12 4.3 Master Portfolio Consolidation form Grade 10/11 4.4 Master Portfolio Consolidation form Grade 12 4.5 Physical Sciences Programme of Assessment Marksheet – Grade10/11 4.6 Physical Sciences Programme of Assessment Marksheet – Grade 12 4.7 Physical Sciences Programme of Assessment Schedule – Grade10/11 4.8 Physical Sciences Programme of Assessment Schedule – Grade 12 4.9 Moderation Tool for First Term Moderation. 4.10 Mark Schedule for Assessment Plan – Grade 12 4.11 Mark Schedule for Assessment Plan – Grade 10/11 4.12 Grid for Setting NCS Tasks, Tests and Examinations

1

1.

AN INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT IN PHYSICAL SCIENCES

Physical Sciences focuses on investigating physical and chemical phenomena through scientific inquiry. By applying scientific models, theories and laws it seeks to explain and predict events in our physical environment. Assessment tasks should focus on the following in an integrated manner: • The learner’s ability to use process skills, critical thinking, scientific reasoning and strategies to investigate and solve problems in a variety of scientific, technological, environmental and everyday contexts (Learning Outcome 1)

2.



The learner’s demonstration of inquiry skills, like planning, observing, collecting data, comprehending, synthesizing, generalizing, hypothesizing and communicating results and conclusions



The learner’s ability to state, explain, interpret, evaluate and apply scientific and technological knowledge in everyday contexts (Learning Outcome 2)



The learner’s ability to identify and critically evaluate scientific knowledge claims and the impact of this knowledge on the quality of socio-economic, environmental and human development (Learning Outcome 3).

CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT

Continuous Assessment involves assessment activities that are undertaken throughout the year, using various kinds of assessment forms, methods and tools. In Grades 10 – 12 continuous assessment comprises two different but related activities: informal daily assessment and a formal Programme of Assessment. Continuous assessment through informal daily assessment and the formal Programme of Assessment should be used to: • Develop learners’ knowledge, skills and values • Assess learners’ strengths and weaknesses • Provide additional support to learners • Revisit or revise certain sections of the Physical Sciences curriculum and • Motivate and encourage learners

2

2.1

DAILY ASSESSMENT IN PHYSICAL SCIENCES

Daily assessment in Physical Sciences should provide learners with opportunities to develop and sharpen their: • • •

practical, scientific and problem solving skills; ability to construct and apply scientific knowledge, and ability to identify and critically evaluate the contested nature of science and its relationships to technology, society and the environment.

Daily assessment tasks can be short, focused and assess only one Assessment Standard within a Learning Outcome at a time. However, some daily assessment activities integrate Learning Outcomes and Assessment Standards. 2.2

PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT

2.2.1 PROGRAMME OF ASSESMENT IN GRADES 10 AND 11 The Programme of Assessment for Physical Sciences in Grades 10 and 11 consists of seven tasks which are internally assessed. Of the seven tasks, the six tasks which are completed during the school year make up 25% of the total mark for Physical Sciences, while the end-of-year examination is the seventh task and makes up the remaining 75%.

Table 1. Tasks for the Programme of Assessment in Grades 10 & 11

PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT % ratio Forms of assessment Number of pieces Marks

25%

75%

Practical Tasks

Research Project

Controlled Tests

Midyear Exams

2

2

40

1 50

1 200

20

20

40

Converted marks 20 Subtotals Grand Total

100

10 100 400 3

100

10

End of year Exam

20 300

The tasks for the Programme of Assessment are to be done at certain times of the school year and the following table indicates when the tasks are to be completed. Table 2. Timeframes for tasks for the Programme of Assessment for grades 10 and 11.

TERM 1 Practical task Controlled Test 1

TERM 2 Practical task Midyear Exam

TERM 3 Research project Controlled Test 2

TERM 4 End of year exam

Practical tasks There are two practical investigations which should assess all Learning Outcomes with the focus on the practical aspects and the process skills required for scientific inquiry and problem solving. Assessment activities should be designed so that learners are assessed on their use of scientific inquiry skills, like planning, observing and gathering information, comprehending, synthesizing, generalizing, hypothesizing and communicating results and conclusions. Practical investigations should assess performance at different cognitive levels across all the Learning Outcomes, with a greater focus on Learning Outcome 1.

Research project A research project should involve the collection of data and/or information to solve a problem or to understand a particular set of circumstances and/or phenomena. While the problem that focuses the research task is well defined, the nature of the data collected will determine the solution to the problem. Another option is a case study provided by the teacher. This case study will be used as a basis for questions, investigations, interpretation and conclusions. In this task different cognitive levels across all the LO’s should be assessed with a greater focus on the AS’s of LO 3.

Controlled tests and midyear Examinations • •

The controlled test in the first term assesses work done in the first term (See work schedule2008). The midyear examination assesses work done in the first and second terms.

4

• •

The controlled test in the third term assesses work done in the third term. All Learning Outcomes must be assessed using the knowledge areas that were covered in the particular term or terms.

Table 3. Weighting of the Learning Outcomes and specification of content across the two papers for the Grade 10 end-of-year examination PAPER 1: PHYSICS FOCUS 2 hours 150 marks

Duration Maximum marks Content

Mechanics Waves, sound and light Electricity and magnetism LEARNING OUTCOME Learning Outcome Practical scientific inquiry and 1: problem-solving skills Learning Outcome Constructing and applying 2: scientific knowledge Learning Outcome The nature of science and its 3: relationship to technology, society and the environment

PAPER 2: CHEMISTRY FOCUS 2 hours 150 marks Chemical change Chemical systems Matter and materials

WEIGHTING 40%

30%

45%

45%

15%

25%

Table 4. Weighting of the Learning Outcomes and specification of content across the two papers for the Grade 11 end-of-year examination. PAPER 1: PHYSICS FOCUS 3 hours 150 marks • Mechanics • Waves, sound and light • Electricity and magnetism • Matter and materials Electronic properties of matter Atomic nuclei

Duration Maximum marks

Content

LEARNING OUTCOME Learning Outcome 1: Practical scientific inquiry and problem-solving skills Learning Outcome 2: Constructing and applying scientific knowledge

5

PAPER 2: CHEMISTRY FOCUS 3 hours 150 marks • Chemical change • Chemical systems • Matter and materials Atomic combinations: molecular structure Ideal gases and thermal properties

WEIGHTING 40%

30%

45%

45%

Learning Outcome 3:

• •



The nature of science and its relationship to technology, society and the environment

15%

25%

Controlled tests and examinations are internally and externally moderated. Controlled tests and examinations must be balanced in terms of the use of cognitive levels (e.g. Bloom’s Taxonomy) and Learning Outcomes and Assessment Standards. Controlled tests and examinations should be analysed diagnostically and appropriate remedial or intervention strategies should be instituted.

2.2.2 PROGRAMME OF ASSESMENT IN GRADE 12 In Grade 12, assessment consists of two components: an internally assessed Programme of Assessment which makes up 25% of the total mark for Physical Sciences and an externally assessed end-of-year examination, which makes up the remaining 75%. Together the Programme of Assessment for Physical Sciences and external assessment make up the annual assessment plan for Grade 12.

Table 5. Annual Assessment Plan for Grade 12 COMPONENTS

PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT

EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT

Assessment Tasks

End-of-year assessment

% Ratio

25% Forms of assessment Number pieces

Practical Tasks

75%

Controlled Research Tests project

Midyear Trial Exams Exam

November Exam

of

Marks Converted marks Subtotals Grand Total

2 40 20

40 20

1 50 20

2 100 100 5 5 100 400

6

1 200 10

1 300 20 300

The tasks for the Programme of Assessment are to be done at certain times of the school year and the following table indicates when the tasks are to be completed.

Table 6. Timeframes for tasks for the Programme of Assessment for Grade 12.

TERM 1 Practical investigation Controlled Test

TERM 2 Practical investigation Midyear Exam

TERM 3 Research project Controlled Test Trial/September exam

TERM 4

End of year exam

Practical Tasks These are the same as for Grades 10 and 11. However, in addition Grade 12 learners will be assessed on their ability to: • Make deductions and evaluations.

Controlled Tests and Internal Exams • • • •

The controlled test in first term assesses work done in the first term (See work schedule 2008) – and could include Grade 11 work if need be. The midyear examination assesses work done in the first and second terms. Third term examinations (September/Trial) assess all the year’s work done according to the work schedule. All Learning Outcomes must be assessed using the knowledge areas that were covered in the particular term or terms.

7

Table 7. Weighting of the Learning Outcomes and specification of content of both papers for the Grade 12 external examination. PAPER 1: PHYSICS FOCUS 3 hours 150 marks • Mechanics • Waves, sound and light • Electricity and magnetism • Matter and materials Optical phenomena and properties of materials Mechanical properties

Duration Maximum marks Content

LEARNING OUTCOME Learning Outcome 1: Learning Outcome 2: Learning Outcome 3:



• •

PAPER 2: FOCUS CHEMISTRY 3 hours 150 marks • Chemical change • Chemical systems • Matter and materials Organic molecules Organic macromolecules

WEIGHTING Practical scientific inquiry and problemsolving skills Constructing and applying scientific knowledge The nature of science and its relationship to technology, society and the environment

40%

30%

45%

45%

15%

25%

Controlled tests and examinations must be balanced in terms of the use of cognitive levels (e.g. Bloom’s Taxonomy) and Learning Outcomes and Assessment Standards. Controlled tests and examinations are internally and externally moderated. Controlled tests and examinations should be analysed diagnostically and appropriate remedial or intervention strategies should be instituted.

8

Research project A research project should involve the collection of data and/or information to solve a problem or to understand a particular set of circumstances and/or phenomena. While the problem that focuses the research task is well defined, the nature of the data collected will determine the solution to the problem. Another option is a case study provided by the teacher. This case study will be used as a basis for questions, investigations, interpretation and conclusions. In this task different cognitive levels across all the LO’s should be assessed with a greater focus on the AS’s of LO 3. 3. MODERATION OF THE ASSESSMENT TASKS IN THE PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT Moderation of Assessment tasks should take place at three levels. LEVEL School

Cluster/District

Provincial

National/UMALUSI

MODERATION REQUIREMENTS Each task which is to be used as part of the Programme of Assessment should be submitted to the subject head for moderation before learners attempt the task. Teacher portfolios and evidence of learner performance should be moderated twice a year by the head of the subject or her/his delegate. Teacher portfolios and a sample of evidence of learner performance must be moderated at least twice a year in grade 12 and once a year in grades 10 and 11. Teachers must bring their portfolios with the tasks prescribed for each moderation session and 10% of learner performance evidence (minimum of 5 learner portfolios if there are fewer than 50 learners in the school). This only applies to Grade 12.Teacher portfolios and a sample of evidence of learner performance must be moderated once a year after the second cluster moderation. This only applies to Grade 12.Teacher portfolios and a sample of evidence of learner performance must be moderated once a year after the Provincial moderation.

9

EASTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DISTRICT: ________________________________ YEAR: ______________________ GRADE 10/11 PHYSICAL SCIENCES LEARNER PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT INDIVIDUAL RECORDING SHEET NAME OF LEARNER SCHOOL

GRADE CENTRE NUMBER

NAME OF TEACHER

Assessment Task

Project Controlled Tests: Controlled Test 1 Controlled Test 2 Total controlled tests

Marks Maximum Programme of obtained mark Assessment mark 50

Programme of Assessment maximum mark 20

100 100 200

10 10 20

Total practical Tasks

40 40 80

20 20 40

June/Midyear exam

200

20

Practical Tasks Practical task 3 Practical task 6

Total marks for Programme of Assessment

DESIGNATION

MODERATION PANEL NAME IN PRINT

10

100

SIGNATURE

DATE

EASTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DISTRICT: _______________________________ YEAR: ________________________ GRADE 12 PHYSICAL SCIENCES LEARNER PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT INDIVIDUAL RECORDING SHEET NAME OF LEARNER

EXAMINATION NUMBER CENTRE NUMBER

SCHOOL NAME OF TEACHER

Research project

50

Programme of Assessment maximum mark 20

Controlled Tests: Controlled Test 1 Controlled Test 2 Total Controlled tests

100 100 200

05 05 10

40 40 80

20 20 40

200 300 500

10 20

Assessment Task

Marks obtained

Maximum mark

Programme of Assessment mark

Practical Tasks Practical Task 3 Practical Task 6

Total practical Tasks June/Midyear exam Trial/September exam Total of June & Trial exams

30

Total marks for Programme of Assessment

100

MODERATION PANEL DESIGNATION

NAME IN PRINT

11

SIGNATURE

DATE

EASTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DISTRICT: ____________________________________ SCHOOL : ________________________________ EDUCATOR: ______________________________ Grade 10/11 PHYSICAL SCIENCES PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT 20_____ MASTER PORTFOLIO CONSOLIDATION FORM ASSESSMENT Task

KNOWLEDGE AREA COVERED/ TOPICS

ASSESSMENT DATE TOOL

Project

Practical Tasks • •

Practical Task 3 Practical Task 6

Controlled Tests Controlled Test 1 Controlled Test 2

June Examination

MODERATION PANEL DESIGNATION

NAME IN PRINT

12

SIGNATURE

DATE

EASTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DISTRICT: ____________________________________ SCHOOL: _________________________________ EDUCATOR: _______________________________ GRADE 12 PHYSICAL SCIENCES PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT 20_____ MASTER PORTFOLIO CONSOLIDATION FORM ASSESSMENT Task

KNOWLEDGE AREA COVERED/ TOPICS

ASSESSMENT TOOL

Research project

Practical Tasks •

Practical Task 3



Practical Task 6

Controlled Tests Controlled Test 1 Controlled Test 2

June Examination

September Exam MODERATION PANEL DESIGNATION

NAME IN PRINT

13

SIGNATURE

DATE

EASTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DISTRICT: _________________________________

DATE: 20_____________

SCHOOL: __________________________________

GRADE: 10 / 11

PHYSICAL SCIENCES PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE 0nly converted marks according to tasks TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3

Controlled Test 1

Practical Task 6

June Examination

Project

Controlled Test 2

TOTAL PoA

Moderated Mark

Date completed Maximum mark for PoA

Practical Task 3

No

Surname and First names

PROGRAM ME OF ASSESSM ENT

20

10

20

20

20

10

100

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Teacher: _____________________ Signature: _______________ Date: _________ HOD: ________________________ Signature: _______________ Date: __________ Principal: ____________________ Signature: _______________ Date: _________ Cluster Leader: _______________ Signature: _______________ Date: _________ District official: _______________ Signature: _______________ Date: _________

14

EASTERNCAPE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DISTRICT: _________________________________

DATE: _______________

SCHOOL: __________________________________

GRADE: 12

PHYSICAL SCIENCES PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE 0nly converted marks according to tasks TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3

Controlled Test 1

Practical Task 6

June Examination

Project

Controlled Test 2

Trial Examination

TOTAL PoA

Moderated Mark

Date completed Maximum mark for PoA

Practical Task 3

No

Surname and First names

PROGRAM ME OF ASSESSM ENT

20

05

20

10

20

05

20

100

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Teacher: _____________________ Signature: _______________ Date: _________ HOD: ________________________ Signature: _______________ Date: __________ Principal: ____________________ Signature: _______________ Date: _________ Cluster Leader: _______________ Signature: _______________ Date: _________ District official: _______________ Signature: _______________ Date: _________ 15

EASTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PHYSICAL SCIENCES CLUSTER MODERATION TOOL

GRADE: 10/11/12

DISTRICT: _____________________________

TERM: 01

SCHOOL: ______________________________

DATE: _________________

TEACHER: _____________________________ MODERATOR:______________________ PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE YES NO COMMENTS A. Master Portfolio (M.P) Master Portfolio available Front cover page (Teacher’s details) available Index / Contents List available Does index link directly with sections of the portfolio? Assessment Task (Practical Investigation – LO1) Evidence of tasks that focus on Assessment Standard 1 Evidence of Assessment tools used for AS1 (above task) Evidence of tasks that focus on Assessment Standard 2 Evidence of Assessment tools used for AS2 (above task) Evidence of tasks that focus on Assessment Standard 3 Evidence of Assessment tools used for AS3 (above task) Evidence of tasks that focus on Assessment Standard 4 Evidence of Assessment tools used for AS4 (above task) Evidence of Internal (School) moderation – school stamp, moderator’s signature and comments Internal Moderation Report available Assessment Task (Control Test) Evidence of Test given Assessment Tool used available Mark list available 16

Total number of learners offering Physical Sciences in Grade 10/11/12: ___________ Number of Learner Portfolios submitted for moderation: _____________ PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE B. Learner Portfolios (L.P) Sufficient number of L.P’s submitted Front cover page (Learner’s details) available per L.P Index / Contents included in each L.P. Does index link directly with sections of the L.P? Practical Investigation Evidence of task(s) that focus on Assessment Standard 1 Evidence of task(s) that focus on Assessment Standard 2 Evidence of task(s) that focus on Assessment Standard 3 Evidence of task(s) that focus on Assessment Standard 4 Have all the assessment tasks above been marked? Has the marking been done according to the assessment tools indicated in the M.P? Are there tasks missing? If so indicate Is marking consistent? Has the teacher made qualitative remarks about the learner’s work? Control Test Evidence of Test written Has the test been marked? Has marking been done according to the assessment tool in M.P? Is marking consistent? Evidence of Teacher’s qualitative remarks Evidence of remedial work Evidence of internal moderation

YES

NO

17

COMMENTS

Recording Has the recording sheet been completed correctly? Has the recording sheet been signed?

SIGNATURE OF TEACHER: ___________________________________________ DATE: _________________

SIGNATURE OF MODERATOR: _______________________________________ DATE: _________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER LEADER: __________________________________ DATE: ________________

SIGNATURE OF DISTRICT OFFICIAL: _________________________________ DATE: _________________

18

EASTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PHYSICAL SCIENCES CLUSTER MODERATION TOOL

GRADE: 10/11/12

DISTRICT: _____________________________

TERM: 02

SCHOOL: ______________________________

DATE: _______________

EDUCATOR: __________________________ MODERATOR: _______________________ PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE

YES

NO

A. Master Portfolio (M.P) Master Portfolio available Front cover page (Teacher’s details) available Index that indicates pages available Does index link directly with sections of the portfolio? Contents list for the PoA tasks available MP components clearly demarcated Annual Formal Programme of Assessment available Workschedule used available Does it show both Formal and Informal Assessment dates?

Assessment Tasks Practical Investigations Correct number of Practical Investigations (2) Evidence of tasks that focus on AS1 of LO1 Evidence of Assessment tools used for AS1 Evidence of tasks that focus on AS2 of LO1 Evidence of Assessment tools used for AS2 Evidence of tasks that focus on AS3 of LO1 Evidence of Assessment tools 19

COMMENTS

used for AS3 Evidence of tasks that focus on AS4 of LO1 Evidence of Assessment tools used for AS4 Midyear Examination Evidence of the Midyear Exam Evidence of the Assessment Tool used Do the questions asked show a spread of the ASs, from the three Physical Sciences LOs?

Recording Mark list available Does it show the learners’ marks for all the Programme of Assessment Tasks? Has the mark list been signed by the school’s HOD and Principal

Internal Moderation School Moderation Policy available Internal Moderation Report available Any evidence of internal moderation on the tasks: comments, signature, date, etc Evidence of learners moderated internally on the marklist (Moderator’s signature & date next learners’ names)

20

Total number of learners offering Physical Sciences in Grade 10/11/12: ___________ Number of Learner Portfolios submitted for moderation: __________ PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE

YES

NO

B. Learner’ Portfolio (L.P) Sufficient number of L.Ps submitted Front cover page (Learner’s details) available per L.P Index with pages available in each L.P Does index link directly with sections of the L.P? Learner’s PoA record of marks available in the L.P

Assessment Tasks Practical Investigations Correct number of Practical Investigations (2) Evidence of task(s) that focus on AS1 of LO1 Evidence of task(s) that focus on AS2 of LO1 Evidence of task(s) that focus on AS3 of LO1 Evidence of task(s) that focus on AS4 of LO1 Have all the assessment tasks above been marked? Has the marking been done according to the assessment tools indicated in the M.P? Are there tasks missing? If so indicate Is marking consistent? Midyear Examination Evidence of the Midyear Exam in the LP Has it been marked? Has marking been done according to the assessment tool in M.P? Is marking consistent? Evidence of Teacher’s qualitative remarks 21

COMMENTS

Evidence of remedial work Evidence of internal moderation Any qualitative remarks written by the Internal Moderator Recording Has the recording sheet completed correctly? Has the recording sheet been signed?

SIGNATURE OF TEACHER: ___________________________________________ DATE: _________________

SIGNATURE OF MODERATOR: _______________________________________ DATE: _________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER LEADER: __________________________________ DATE: _________________

SIGNATURE OF DISTRICT OFFICIAL: _________________________________ DATE: _________________

22

EASTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PHYSICAL SCIENCES CLUSTER MODERATION TOOL

GRADE: 10/11/12

DISTRICT: _____________________________

TERM: 03

SCHOOL: ______________________________

DATE: _______________

NAME OF MODERATOR: ___________________________________ PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE

YES

NO

A. Master Portfolio (M.P) Master portfolio available Front cover page (Teacher’s details) available Index that indicates pages available Does index link directly with sections of the portfolio? Contents list for the PoA tasks available MP components clearly demarcated Annual Formal Programme of Assessment available Workschedule used available Does it show both Formal and Informal Assessment dates?

Assessment Tasks Control Test Evidence of the test given. Evidence of Assessment Tools used for the test. Is there evidence in the questions asked that shows coverage of three ASs of LO2? Is there evidence of the Physical Sciences LOs in the Control Tests? Evidence of integration Physical Sciences ASs in the questions asked

23

COMMENTS

Research Task Evidence of Research Task (1) Evidence of the three ASs of LO3 in the task Evidence of Assessment tools used in the task for the ASs Trial Examinations Evidence of trial exam written Evidence of paper 1 and 2 Evidence of Assessment Tools used for the marking.

Recording Mark list available Does it show the learners’ marks for all the Programme of Assessment Tasks? Has the mark list been signed by the school’s HOD and Principal

Internal Moderation School Moderation Policy available Internal Moderation Report available Any evidence of internal moderation on the tasks: comments, signature, date, etc Evidence of learners moderated internally on the marklist (Moderator’s signature & date next learners’ names)

24

Total number of learners offering Physical Sciences in Grade 10 = Number of Learner Portfolios submitted for moderation = PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE

YES

NO

B. Learner’ Portfolio (L.P) Sufficient number of L.Ps submitted Front cover page (Learner’s details) available per L.P Index with pages available in each L.P Does index link directly with sections of the L.P? Learner’s PoA record of marks available in the L.P

ASSESSMENT TASKS Control Test Evidence of test written. Has the test been marked? Has marking been done according to the assessment tool in M.P? Is marking consistent? Any evidence of Teacher’s qualitative remarks on the L.Ps Evidence of remedial work Evidence of internal moderation Has the Internal Moderator written any qualitative remarks? Research Task Evidence of Research Task in the LP Evidence of marking Has marking been done according to the Assessment Tools in the MP? Evidence of teacher’s qualitative remarks Evidence Internal Moderator’s qualitative remarks Trial Eaminations Evidence of trial exam written Evidence of paper 1 and 2 Has marking been done according to the marking tool in the MP?

25

COMMENTS

Has marking been done consistently? RECORDING Has the recording sheet been completed correctly? Has the recording sheet been signed?

SIGNATURE OF TEACHER: ___________________________________________ DATE: _________________

SIGNATURE OF MODERATOR: _______________________________________ DATE: _________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER LEADER: __________________________________ DATE: _________________

SIGNATURE OF DISTRICT OFFICIAL: _________________________________ DATE: _________________

26

27