Triggered activities with the waste generated in steel

Triggered activities with the waste generated in steel production: a study from the ergonomics standpoint Yazigi, ... Falzon, Pierre. (2009). Ergonomi...

1 downloads 340 Views 53KB Size
Triggered activities with the waste generated in steel production: a study from the ergonomics standpoint

Yazigi, S.*; Yazigi, R.; Porfiro, F.; Oliveira, R. *FIEMG- Federação das Indústrias do Estado de Minas Gerais Ergonomia/SST/GES- Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho / Gerência Executiva de Saúde Av. do Contorno 4456-9ºandar- Funcionários – Belo Horizonte/MG- Brasil. CEP30110-028.

Abstract: The tract of waste in industrial production creates a part sector of the production process, in which activities are developed with ergonomic risk varied, either in treatment, transportation or disposal of material generated. Through the methodology of Ergonomic Work Analysis, questions were raised about the influence of the waste generated in the production of steel and its implications at work. Thus, it can be said the determinants of ergonomic risk in a work activity are related to various aspects of the production process, physical features of the industry, the layout of the work area, the types of tools used and work organization. These elements may influence the operative mode adopted by a worker. Understanding the variability of activity may allow taking corrective actions or design in the workplace, providing better interaction with humans, reduced physical and cognitive overloads which directly influence with worker productivity. Therefore, the study highlights the determinants of ergonomic risks, recommending improvements in the work process that are related to adaptation in the production process.

Key Words: Ergonomics, Ergonomic Risk, steel production, Waste, Productivity, Ergonomic Work Analysis.

References Béguin, P. (2007).Taking activity into account during the design process.@ctivités,4 (2),115121. Daniellou, F. (2004). A ergonomia em busca de seus princípios: debates epistemológico. São Paulo. Ed. Edgard Blücher, p.183. Daniellou, F. (2005). The French-speaking ergonomists’ approach to work activity: cross influences of field intervention and conceptual models. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6 (5), 409-427. Daniellou, F. (2007). Simulating future work activity is not only a way of improving workstation design. @ctivités, 4 (2), p.84-90. De Keyser, V. (1991). Work analysis in French language ergonomics: origins and current research trends. Ergonomics, 34(6):653-669. Falzon, Pierre. (2009). Ergonomia. São Paulo. Ed. Blucher, p. 308-313. Garrigou, A.; Daniellou, F.; Carballeda G.; Ruaud S. (1995). Activity analysis in participatory design and analysis of participatory design activity. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15, p.311-327. Theureau, J. (2003). Course-of-action analysis & course-of-action centered design. In E. Hollnagel (ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Mahwah. Wisner, A. (1989). Fatigue and human reliability revisited: In the light of ergonomics and work psychopathology. Ergonomics, 32, v.7.