Understanding the Severity of Climate Loads as related to

Understanding the Severity of Climate Loads as related to Cladding and Windows Presented by Michael A. Lacasse (NRC-IRC) and Silvio Plescia (CMHC)...

10 downloads 638 Views 7MB Size
Understanding the Severity of Climate Loads as related to Cladding and Windows Presented by Michael A. Lacasse (NRC-IRC) and Silvio Plescia (CMHC)

Introduction

 Goals – Understand some climatic phenomena – Introduce some basic elements – Reviewing response of cladding to WDR loads

The Elements

Wind and Rain  WDR on the wall  water penetration

υ

Wind 

∆p across wall 

T , WV, P + ive p

air leakage

– ive p

The Elements

∆T and ∆pw across wall

T, WV

T, WV

Heat and water vapour transfer

Climate Parameters – Cladding / windows

• Two climate parameters considered • Wind velocity • Rain intensity

• Combined to derive façade related parameters

• Driving Rain Wind Pressure (DWRP) • Wind Driven Rain (WDR)

Wind

Angle <°40

Leeward

Pressure distributions

Windward

Wind flow around obstructions

Section

v =x

Small

v =x

v =x

Medium

Large

Raindrop trajectories

Wind

Wind Velocity Pressure Wind Speed Km/h 0 5 10 20 40 50 57 60 65 70 80 90 100 103 122 150 200 300

Pa = 0.61  (wind speed, m/sec)2

m/sec 0 1 3 6 11 14 16 17 18 19 22 25 28 29 34 42 56 83

mph 0 3 6 12 25 31 35 37 41 44 50 56 62 64 76 93 124 186

1 m/sec = 3.6 Km/h

Wind Velocity Pressure Pa 0 1 5 19 75 118 150 169 200 231 300 381 471 500 700 1059 1883 4236

1 mi. = 1.609 Km

Driving Rain Wind Pressure - 1 hr avg. Code 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Location Calgary AB Charlottetown PEI Edmonton AB Fredericton NB Halifax NS Montreal QC Ottawa ON Quebec QC Saskatoon SK St John's NF Toronto ON Vancouver BC Whitehorse YK Winnipeg MB Yellowknife NT Sandspit BC Victoria BC Victoria Gonz Hts BC Regina SK Iqaluit NU Sept Iles QC Shearwater NS Port Aux Basques NF

Driving Rain Wind Pressure - 5 min avg.

Code 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Location Calgary AB Charlottetown PEI Edmonton AB Fredericton NB Halifax NS Montreal QC Ottawa ON Quebec QC Saskatoon SK St John's NF Toronto ON Vancouver BC Whitehorse YK Winnipeg MB Yellowknife NT Sandspit BC Victoria BC Victoria Gonz Hts BC Regina SK Iqaluit NU Sept Iles QC Shearwater NS Port Aux Basques NF

of raindrop = Vt

Terminal Velocity

Wind and Rain

rh = rv U/Vt

Wind Speed = U

Wind and Rain

Wind-driven rain: 5 min. average

Monthly & extreme daily rainfall – Calgary Monthly Rainfall / extreme daily rainfall (mm)

140

Calgary - Climate Normals (Averages) 0ver 30 years (1971- 2000) 120 Calgary - Rainfall (mm) Extreme Daily Rainfall (mm)

100

80

60

40

20

0 Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Month

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Monthly & extreme daily rainfall – Red Deer Monthly rainfall / extreme daily rainfall (mm)

140 Red Deer - Climate Normals (Averages) 0ver 30 years (1971- 2000) 120 Red Deer - Rainfall (mm) Extreme Daily Rainfall (mm)

100

80

60

40

20

0 Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Month

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Daily rainfall - June 2005 – Calgary

Rainfall (mm)

Daily Calgary Rainfall - June 2005 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Extreme daily and Maximum July daily Maximum Septem ber daily - 1985 95.3

Maximum June daily - 1932 92.6

Maximum August daily - 1945 80.8

79.2

75.9

Calgary, AB Year / M onth

Maximum daily / June 2005 46.2 36.6

18.6

34.5

10.2 5.6

4

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1927-Jul

1

1.6 2.2

0

/ / / / / /

June S ept. A ugust A ugust June July

46.2 92.6** 75.9 80.8** 79.2** , 95.3* **

Monthly Total

Monthly Norm al

247.6* 109.8 238.3 99.8 119.927.4 23.4 245.5 25.9

79.8 41.7 58.7 58.7 79.8 67.9

16 e value; ** extrem e daily value for m onth *E xtrem 17.3 13 7.6

10.4 0

1

37.1

18

14.8 8.2

2005 1985 1954 1945 25.6 1932 1927

43.2

Rainfall (m m ) M axim um Daily

0

0

7.6

0

0

0

0

0

1.2

0

7.1 0.2 0

1.2

0

0

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2005-Jun

1932-Jun

1945-Aug

1954-Aug

1985-Sep

Daily rainfall - June 2005 – Red Deer

Rainfall (mm)

Red Deer - June 2005 - Daily rainfall (mm) 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Extrem e daily and Maximum August daily - 1938

124.2

Maximum June daily - 1970 Maximum July daily - 1949 99.6

85.3

Max. daily @ Extreme monthy - 1999 75.2

Maxim um daily - June 2005

51.4

47.8

20.8

3

3

0.2

4

/ / / / /

June July June July August

42.7 62.4 99.6** 34 85.3** , 124.2* **

Monthly Totals 145.5 274.4* 243.8* 2nd 154.9 182.4

5

0

6

7

2005-July

6.8

5.4 0.2

0

8

9

1

0

0

0

1

0

0.2

0

0

10.4 2

0

1.4

0

0

0

0

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1999-July

1970-June

1949-July

1938 - August

Monthly Norm al 92 93.1 92 93.1 70

12.6 *Extrem e value; ** extreme daily value for m12.6 onth 8.4

7

2

2005 1999 1970 1949 1938

18.5

15.2

1

42.7

27.6

29.2

28.6

Maxim um daily

Year / M onth

52

5

Rainfall (mm )

Red Deer, AB

62.4

Calgary – total annual rainfall / 2005 to 2008

Climate Load

Calgary

MEWS: wet-wet-avg 1978-1978-1992

Climate Load (cont.)

Edmonton

MEWS: wet-wet-avg 1965-1965-1968

Stucco

Cladding response

1st 4 months (frame every 4 hours)

Stucco

Cladding response

3 years (frame every 24 hours)

MEWS* – water penetration tests on stucco walls • Moisture management system • Concealed stucco with local drainage • Stucco finish: • 19 mm lime-cement plaster • Self-furring metal lath: • woven wire • Sheathing membrane: • 60 min building paper • Sheathing board: • 11 mm OSB

*MEWS – Consortium for Moisture Management for Exterior Wall Systems – http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/projects/irc/exterior-walls.html

Water penetration - Stucco ⇒ “Static” 1200

3.1 L /20 min.

3

Static pressure differential (Pa)

1000

4

Water entry beneath electrical box (4 min.) and ventilation duct (9 min.)

1000 Pa 5

Window leakage at 65 min.

800

6

12

600

7

13

Position of moisture sensors

10

500 Pa

14

400

9

2.66 L /20 min.

16

300 Pa

200

2.52 L /20 min.

0

0 Pa20

40

55

11

88

22

60

80

Time (min.)

100

120

99

66

2.16 L /20 min.

75 Pa

15 15

14 14

150 Pa 0

13 13

11 11

140

1.25 L /20 min.

Penetration of sheathing board at (a) - 35 min. and in cavity at (b) beneath window - 90 min.

33

44

77

10 10

12 12

16 16

Stucco - Continuous water spray Estimate of water seepage Presence of water on OSB surface

OSB

Seepage path along boundary of discontinuity Entry point Micro droplet ~ 35µL*

Run-off

∆P ~ 250 Pa

Q = 35µL/min x 60 min. x 15 = 31.5 mL/hour.

Effect of climate loads  Climate loads differ across country – Intensity, duration and frequency of precipitation determines moisture load at given location

 Interaction of wind on building affects degree of precipitation – – Building height, shape affect pattern of wetting and redistribution of rainfall

 Moisture load – affected by other building features such as – balconies, overhangs, mullions, and flashing – Features collect and redistribute rainwater

Mitigating effects of WDR

– – – –

Deflect Drain Dry Durable

• Soffits (Eaves-”overhang”) • Drip cap flashing • Sill flashing • Deflectors at jambs

Moisture load – affected by overhangs

Tool to assess rain fall load • Cladding / window exposure nomograph • Provides qualitative sense of rainfall load on cladding / window – “protection from Overhang”

• Considers: • Exposure/surroundings – i.e. terrain / topography • Exposed; rural; suburban; “built-up”

• Exposure category (NBCC, Moisture index = MI) • MI (Calg. = 0.37; Edm. = 0.48; Vanc. (region)=1.14 to 2.07)

• Overhang ratio = Overhang width / wall height • Varies from 0 to 0.5 • An  in ratio provides increased protection to rainfall

• Determines exposure category • High (redundant design); moderate; low (minimum acceptable)

Example 1 Single Storey House (suburbia) Toronto (MI = 0.80 to 0.86) Eaves:

16”

Bottom of Window: 4.5 feet below eaves; OHR = 1.3/4.5 = 0.288

Example 2 Same as above except: Single Storey House (centretown)

• Water penetration through face of wall assemblies • Low to moderate risk depending on degree of exposure and protection • Yes – there will be water absorption in porous materials • Stucco – including surface cracks • Brick – through mortar joints • What can be done to further reduce the risk to water penetration to sheathing board?

Mitigating effects of WDR

– – – –

Deflect Drain Dry Durable

Performance Monitoring of Rainscreen Wall Assemblies Vancouver British Columbia

RDH Building Engineering

Performance Monitoring of Rainscreen Wall Assemblies Vancouver British Columbia

RDH Building Engineering

Performance Monitoring of Rainscreen Wall Assemblies Vancouver British Columbia General conclusions – •Rainscreen wall assemblies used in wood frame buildings performed adequately •Overhangs reduce wetting of walls in proportion to their size and ratio to wall height •WDR increases MC of strapping but takes longer to affect sheathing •Rainscreen cladding alone • Will not prevent wood MC from reaching levels which can support fungal growth • if interface (or other) details allow bulk water or other moisture source (dryer vents) to infiltrate behind the exterior cladding for prolonged periods of time

Mitigating effects of WDR

– – – –

Deflect Drain Dry Durable

– Selection and compatibility of materials – Sequence of installation – Attention to installation details at wall penetrations; e.g. – Windows – Ducts – Electrical outlets

Categorization of wall defects CATEGORIZATION OF PROBLEMS BY AFFECTED BUILDING ELEMENT Number of Problems Category ID 1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Description

Stucco Windows: No sealants at frame/cladding joint 9 Windows: No sealants at corner mitre joints 10 Windows: Poor flashing at head or sill 13 Windows: Poor building paper installation 6 Subtotal Windows 38 Poor Deck/Walkway/Balcony Waterproofing: Field 12 Poor Deck/Walkway/Balcony Waterproofing: 16 Junction with walls Subtotal Deck/Walkway/Balcony 28 Poor Guardrail Saddle Joints 13 Poor Guardrail Cap Flashings 8 Poor Parapet Cap Flashings 7 Subtotal Horizontal Surface Flashings 28 Poor Base/Transition/Control Joint Flashings 14 Poor Roof/Wall Joint Flashings 3 Poor Eavestroughs / Downspouts 3 3 Poor Concrete Slab / Wall Joints Poor Dryer Vents: Lint plugged, leaking in wall 6 Poor Vents: No sealing or flashing at hood 5 Poor Other Details 8 Material / Installation Defects: 10 Cladding, Weather Barrier, Sheathing TOTALS 146

Vinyl 1 1 1 3 3

Wood

Other

1 3 4 1 1

0

3 3 1 1 5

2 5 4

0 1

9 1

1

1

1 2 2

1 1 2 2 1 4

17

27

1

1 3

Total # of Problems 10 12 16 7 45 16 17 33 22 13 8 43 15 3 5 5 8 8 12 16 193

J. E. H. MacDonald - Autumn in Algoma 1918