lr
\, I
AN
AP
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara & Manajemen Publik tssN 2087-843s
Vofume1 | Nomor2 | Juli 2011
Transformasi Administrasi Negara H.A.DjadjaSaefullah Kebijakan PublikdalamKancahPeradaban Dunia yangTerbelah: Memahami PolitikEtnisdalam Perumusan Kebijakan Publik Erwan AgusPurwanto Demokrasi dan PolitikHybridRegimesSebagai Demokrasi Politiklndonesia StudiPergeseran UU No.22/1999 menjadiUU No,3A2004 'i Tamrin
Korupsi, Budaya Politik, danDemokrasi di lndonesia FaridaNurani Administrasi Publikvs Administrasi Negara: Suatu Polemik Nomenklatur Atau Normatif YogiSuprayogi Sugandi r Revitalisasi Responsibilitas Sistem danAkuntabilitas Birokrasi SriJuniWoroAstutidanSupriyanto
Daftar Isi
Transformasi AdministrasiNegara H.A.Djadja Saefullah Kebrjakan Publik dalamKancahPeradaban DuniayangTerbelah:MemahamiPolitik EtnisdalamPerumusan KebijakanPublik
ll
f,rwan Agus Purwanto Demokrasi danPolitik Hybrid RegimesSebagaiDemokrasiPolitik Indonesia StudiPergeseran(I(J No.22/1999menjadi(lU No,32/2004
29
Tamrin Korupsi,BudayaPolitik, dan Demokrasidi Indonesia
43
FaridaNurani Administrasi Publik vs AdministrasiNegara:SuatuPolemikNomenklaturAtau Normatif
55
YogiSuprayogiSugandi Revitalisasi SistemResponsibilitas danAkuntabilitasBirokrasi Sri Juni Woro Astuti dan Supriyanto
65
RevitalisasiSistemResponsibilitasdan Akuntabilitas
Birokrasi SRI JUNI WORO ASTUTI. I SUPRIYANTO2
Abstract There were still dfficulties in implementing responsibility and accountability system within the bureaucracy effectiveU. This is caused by various factors, such as the low capacity of pedormance management of civil servants and the strong patronage culture within the bureaucracy and society. Both conditions become an obstacle in the ffirt to enhance the professionalism of civil servants.In addition, external constraints also emergedas the negative impact of democracy and regional autonomy system that is characterized by local political euphoria, which makesthe bureaucracy increasingly co-opted by the political power Therefore, it is very important to revitalize the accountability and responsibility systemthat includes bureaucratic, legal, professional and political accountability proportionally in order to improve the performance of governmental organizations. Based on the premise above, this paper aims to examine the e{fectivenessof the accountability systemwithin the government organizations and trying to formulate conceptually what can be done to revitalize the system. It is believed to bring good governance in public service delivery in the era of autonomy and democratization.
Key word s: Responsibility ; Accountability ; Good Governance
A. PENDAHULUAN
banyakterjadipenyimpanganyang dilakukan Hasil survey dari berbagai kalangan pejabat politik maupun birokratik, antara menun-jukkanbahwa pelaksanaanotonomi lain kasus penyalahgunaandana APBD daerahsejaktahun2001belumdiiringi dengan sepertiyangtedadi di beberapadaerahdi Jawa peningkatankualitas pelayananpublik yang Timur antara lain di KabupatenSitubondo semakin baik. Fakta menunjukkanbahwa sebesar43,7 mllyar (Jawa Pos, 26 Maret IKetua Program Studi Magister Administrasi Publik, pascasarjana Universitas Wijaya Putra Surabaya, Hp. 081330 892518, e-mail:
[email protected],
[email protected]. : Ketua Program Studi Administrasi Negara, FISIB Universitas Wijaya Putra Surabaya,korespondensi:
[email protected]
Volume 1 lNomor2l Juli2011
2009), kasus gratifikasi di pemerintahkota Surabayasebesar720 juta rupiah (JawaPos, 24 Maret 2009).
65
JNNMEP
