FDA Medical Device Industry Coalition

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard April 2, 2010 William Hyman, Sc.D. 1 FDA Medical Device Industry Coalition ISO 14971: Overview of the standard...

10 downloads 728 Views 85KB Size
ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

FDA Medical Device Industry Coalition

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard Risk Management Through Product Life Cycle: An Educational Forum William A. Hyman Department of Biomedical Engineering Texas A&M University

Medical devices – Application of risk management to medical devices - 14 pages in body - 63 pages in 10 Annexes

April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

2

1

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Contents „ „ „ „ „ „ „ „ „

Scope Terms and definitions General requirements Risk analysis Risk evaluation Risk control Residual risk acceptability Report/documentation Post-production April 2010

3

Contents „ „ „ „ „ „ „ „ „

Scope Terms and definitions General requirements Risk analysis Risk evaluation Risk control Residual risk acceptability Report/documentation Post-production April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

4

2

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Annexes „ „ „ „ „ „ „ „ „ „

Rationale Overview Identifying device characteristics that have risk Risk concepts Examples of hazards Risk management plan Techniques In vitro Biological hazards Residual risk April 2010

5

Observations on 14971 „ It

is “voluntary” „ It is cited and recognized by FDA A search within FDA for ISO 14971 produces 564 items! „ It’s

useful application requires knowledge and diligence April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

3

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Observations on 14971 „

„

The reasons to undertake risk management (guided by 14971) are that: „ Reducing risk is a good thing „ Compliance is also a good thing Don’t let the compliance imperative overwhelm the risk control imperative

April 2010

Direct citations of 14971 in submitted documents „

„

From an MDR: …risk analysis (performed according to ISO 14971 2000… From a 510(k) Summary: …risk analysis preformed identified…by ISO 14971and QSR and internal procedures for risk analysis.

April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

8

4

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

General principles „

Risk is commonly described as having two principle components: > Severity if the harm occurs > Probability of the harm occurring

April 2010

9

A few definitions „ „

„

Harm is the adverse event Hazard is the potential cause of the harm Note: You can detect a hazard before it causes harm, but detecting harm means the harm already occurred Safety is the absence of unacceptable risks But unacceptable to whom?

April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

10

5

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

General principles „

„

Risk management is something that you have to actively do It is not simply a byproduct of general good intentions and good engineering

April 2010

11

General principles Risk can often not be reduced to zero…but this is not an excuse for all hazards and harms „ There may be “residual risks” after appropriate risk evaluation and control „ Residual risks must undergo acceptance and communication activities „

12

William Hyman, Sc.D.

6

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

The process – part 1 Risk Analysis Risk

Risk Evaluation

Assessment

Risk Control

13

April 2010

The process – part 1 Risk Analysis Cycle!

Risk

Risk Evaluation

Assessment

Risk Control

April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

14

7

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

The process – part 2 Risk Analysis Risk Evaluation Risk Control Cycle!

Acceptability?

15

The process – part 3 Risk Analysis Risk Evaluation Risk Control Acceptability?

Risk Management

Cycle!

Repor t Post Production

William Hyman, Sc.D.

16

8

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

A note on post production Manufacturing deviations „ Complaints and complaint handling „ CAPA Capture „ Recalls „

Evaluate

Act Evaluate April 2010

17

General requirements in 14971 (Section 3) „

„

„ „

A formal (documented) process and plan in place Management commitment „ Resources „ Personnel Qualified personnel Documented results April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

18

9

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Risk analysis (Section 4) Intended use and misuse „ Risk related characteristics „ Hazard identification „

> known and foreseeable „

Risk estimation > systematic > based on available and general information April 2010

19

Risk evaluation (Section 5) „

Manufacturer determined criteria for Risk acceptability decision making

„

There is not a predetermined, all purpose acceptable level of risk > no equation > no regulation April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

20

10

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Risk control (Section 6) - Engineering „ „

„

Elimination by (re)design Protective measures to protect against the risk – both physical and alarms Information (IFUs, training) Preferably in this order! You shouldn’t try to fix a dangerous design with a warning (if you could have reasonably designed it out)! April 2010

21

Risk control (Section 6) -Management „

„

„

Residual risk evaluation after controls are applied Another round of acceptance decision making including Risk/benefit analysis (Section 6.5) > an effort to make otherwise unacceptable risks acceptable – which is potentially confusing If accepted --- disclosure decision making April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

11

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Overall risk (Section 7) - Management „

After all individual risk control activity has been done… then decision making applied to complete design Note: assessing the collective risk that results from the individual risks is a challenging and imprecise procedure April 2010

23

Report (Section 8) „

Review pre product release ¾ ¾ ¾

„

Appropriately implemented Overall residual risk is acceptable Post production processes are in place

Documented

April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

24

12

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Post production(Section 9) Collect and review „ Attention to previously unrecognized risks „ Attention to severity or rate of occurrence above originally estimated „ Include feedback into risk management process itself „

April 2010

25

Annexes „ „ „

„ „ „ „ „ „ „

Rationale Overview Identifying device characteristics associated with risk Risk concepts Examples of hazards Risk management plan Techniques In vitro Biological hazards Residual risk

26

William Hyman, Sc.D.

13

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Annex C – Questions -examples „ „ „ „ „

Intended and means of use (& user) Materials and components Sterile, or user sterilization Measurements and data interpretation Use in conjunction with… interfacing

„ „

Unwanted outputs (e.g. Noise, heat, EMI) Susceptible to environment, forces, etc.

27

Annex C – Questions (cont) „ „ „ „ „ „

Software (& menus) Reuse, intended and single use Installation & use training New manufacturing processes Transmittal of user information User interface issues – human factors

distractions alarms predictable misuse 28

William Hyman, Sc.D.

14

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Note „

„

Lists of questions, lists of hazards, check lists, pull down menus, etc are not a substitute for thoughtful analysis by a knowledgeable person The more unique/different your device is, the less likely it is that pre-prepared lists will be comprehensive

April 2010

29

Annexes „ „ „

„ „ „ „ „ „ „

William Hyman, Sc.D.

Rationale Overview Identifying device characteristics associated with risk Risk concepts Examples of hazards Risk management plan Techniques In vitro Biological hazards Residual risk

30

15

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Annex D – Risk concepts „

Probability and severity scales Qualitative – 3 and 5 level scales are shown

Severity Catastrophic Critical Serious Minor Negligible

Death Permanent impairment or life threatening Medical intervention No medical intervention Inconvenience or temporary 31

Annex D – Risk concepts „

Probability and severity scales Probability – with verbal or numerical descriptors Frequent Probable Occasional Remote Improbable

14971

other

>10-3

highly likely will occur may occur possible but unlikely very unlikely

< 10-3 and >= 10-4 < 10-4 and >=10-5 < 10-5 and >=10-6 < 10-6

32

William Hyman, Sc.D.

16

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Annex D – Risk concepts „

Scale issues How many levels? 3? 5? 10? Levels are often ill defined especially probability Often imprecise, yet precision is pretended Tendency to be optimistic (if not cheat)

33

Annex D – Risk concepts „

Matrix

Probability

Severity

William Hyman, Sc.D.

17

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Annex D – Risk concepts „

Matrix

Probability

Good (more or less)

Severity

Annex D – Risk concepts „

Matrix

Bad (more or less)

Probability

Good (more or less)

William Hyman, Sc.D.

Severity

18

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Annex D – Risk concepts „

Matrix

Bad (more or less)

Probability

Good (more or less)

Severity

Challenging!

Annex D – Risk concepts „

Matrix

Bad (more or less)

And the rest?

Probability

Good (more or less)

William Hyman, Sc.D.

Severity

Challenging!

19

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Annex D – Risk concepts „

„

There is no zone that is automatically acceptable or unacceptable The manufacturer must have their own decision and sign off process

April 2010

39

Annex D – Risk concepts Analysis of Risk: Are Current Methods Theoretically Sound? Applying risk assessment may not give manufacturers the answers they think they are getting Nataly F. Youssef and William A. Hyman http://www.mddionline.com/article/analysis-risk-arecurrent-methods-theoretically-sound

April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

40

20

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Annexes „ „ „

„ „ „ „ „ „ „

Rationale Overview Identifying device characteristics associated with risk Risk concepts Examples of hazards Risk management plan Techniques In vitro Biological hazards Residual risk

41

Annex G- Risk management techniques „

Preliminary hazard analysis (PHA) early review of potential risks and their possible causation early guidance on what will need to be controlled

April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

42

21

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Annex G- Risk management techniques „

Fault tree analysis (FTA) > define a bad event > identify what can lead to that event > identify what can lead to the things that lead to the event > etc

43

April 2010

FTA Bad event #1 Cause #1

Cause #2

Cause (a) of

Cause (b) of

cause #1

cause #1

April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

Cause #3

44

22

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Annex G- Risk management techniques „

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis(FMEA) > identify a failure mode of compoent, device, or user > identify the effects of that failure mode > perform risk assessment to determine if the effect requires action

April 2010

45

Annex G- Risk management techniques „

„

Hazard and Operability Study(HAZOP) > similar to FMEA > emphasis on use of system Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points > similar to or uses many of the same methods > emphasis on processes (e.g. manufacturing) April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

46

23

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

Annexes „ „ „

„ „ „ „ „ „ „

Rationale Overview Identifying device characteristics associated with risk Risk concepts Examples of hazards Risk management plan Techniques In vitro Biological hazards Residual risk

47

Annex J- Residual risk Communication „ „ „

Audience Method Effectiveness

April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

48

24

ISO 14971: Overview of the standard

April 2, 2010

SUMMARY „

„

„

„

Risk management is a good thing… even if there wasn’t an FDA 14971 is a well recognized guide to risk management methodology But…it is not a cook book, or a check list, or an alternative to conscientious effort The objective is to use it thoughtfully as opposed to going through the motions to meet regulatory requirements April 2010

49

Questions?

April 2010

William Hyman, Sc.D.

50

25