S2E10NW9497 2.7666 ECHO BAY
010
VLF-EM 16 GROUND SURVEY
r* R rt r'*- Cc *i N'v ci- D l-
on the
.v.ra 201384 ECHO BAY PROPERTY SHOAL LAKE AND LAKE OF THE WOODS AREA
MURRAY MORRISON, B.Se.
Claims;
Kenora # 727201 - 208, 210 - 212, 214 215, 218 - 219, 224 - 23 J (23 claims in total).
Location;
The Echo Bay property is situated 23 miles (37 km) southwest of Kenora, Ontario, at the west end of Echo Bay, Lake of the Woods, or immediately northeast of Clytie Bay, Shoal Lake. Lat. 49*38' Long. 94*57' N.T.S. 52-E-10
Owner;
Murray Morrison
Operator;
Murray Morrison
Date Started;
June 11, 1984
Date Completed;
June 20, 1984
Kelowna, B.C.
August 10, 1984
S8E10NW9497 2 .7e66 ECHO BAY
010C
PAGE SUMMARY ..............................................
1
INTRODUCTION .. . .. . ... .. . ...................... .. .. . . . LOCATION, ACCESS, TOPOGRAPHY, AND VEGETATION .........
3 3
CLAIM STATUS .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
6
HISTORY OF PREVIOUS WORK . . . .. ... ,. .. . .... . .. . . .... .. . REGIONAL GEOLOGY .. ..... .. .. . .... .. . .. . . . . .. . ...... ... LOCAL GEOLOGY .... . . ... . .... .... .. .. . . .. . .. .. .. ... . .. . 1984 VLF-EM 16 SURVEY .. . .. . .. .. . ...... . . . ..... . .. .. . . DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE VLF-EM 16 SURVEY .... CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................... REFERENCES . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . .............
7 7 Q 12 13 13 15
APPENDIX "A" STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS . . .. .. . . . .... APPENDIX "B" REPORT OF WORK ..........................
16 17
ILLUSTRATIONS LOCATION MAP (ONTARIO) LOCATION MAP (Scale: 1:50,000)
Fig. EB-84-1 .......
Fig. EB-84-2 NORTH ECHO BAY PROPERTY, LOCAL GEOLOGY Fig. EB-84-3 SOUTH ECHO BAY PROPERTY, LOCAL GEOLOGY Fig. EB-8/t-Jf ECHO BAY PROPERTY, CLAIMS, GRID, SURFACE FEATURES Map EB-84-5 ECHO BAY PROPERTY, VLF-EM 16 SURVEY DATA Map EB-84-6
k
.......
5
.......
9
.......
10
..in pocket
..in pocket
ECHO BAY PROPERTY, VLF-EM 16
SURVEY, FRASER FILTERED IN-PHASE
Map EB-84-7
..in pocket
SUMMARY
The 23 mineral claims making up the Echo Bay property, located 23 miles (37 km) southwest of Kenora, Ontario, were staked in June 1983 to cover ground that was believed to have a high pot ential for hosting economic gold mineralization. The property which lies immediately west of Echo Bay on Lake of the Woods, or northeast of Clytie Bay on Shoal Lake is underlain by geology that has features in common with two nearby active gold camps, and three past producing gold mines. At the first gold camp at High Lake 8 miles (12.9 km) northwest of the "'Echo Bay property the best reserves to date are 90,000 tons of 0.3 oz gold/ton. Exploration work is continuing at this camp. The second gold camp is 7 miles (11.3 taa) southwest of the Echo Bay property near Stevens Island in Shoal Lake where Union Carbide is presently bulk sampling material from new re serves of 2 million tons of 0.3 oz gold/ton at the Duport Mine. These reserves were found by Selco during a drill program a few years ago. The three past producing high grade gold and silver mines lie just k miles (6.4 km) south of the Echo Bay property. These mines were the Mikado Mine (28,335 oz gold, 41 oz silver), the Cedar Island Mine (4941 oz gold, 3884 oz silver) and the Olympia Mine (332 oz gold, 58 oz silver). Past mining history and recent exploration developments indicate that the Shoal Lake - Echo Bay region represents a very prospec tive gold environment. In June 1984 a VLF-EM 16 survey was conducted over the Echo Bay property as a first phase of exploration. The results of the survey verified that several faults mapped by the OGS cross the property. The existence of many new subparallel faults were also indicated by the survey. Continued . . .
- 2 -
SUMMARY - C ontinued
It is believed that faulting on the property, as indicated by the VLF-EM survey and government mapping, could have provided the structure for the formation of Shoal Lake type orebodies, while the Canoe Lake Stock, or offshoots from it, could have supplied the heat or source of solutions to form gold orebodies. Limited prospecting on the property has outlined several areas where pyrite and silica have been introduced into the rocks, but no assaying has yet been done for gold. At this point a program of lithogeochemical sampling for gold, silver, arsenic, copper and molybdenum is recommended to define geochemically promising areas that are coincident with the identified faulting. Promising targets should then be drilled to test for gold mineralization.
- 3 INTRODUCTION
The Echo Bay property, made up of 23 mineral claims (Kenora #727201-308, 210-212, 214-215, 218-219 and 224-23J) is situ ated 23 miles (37 km) southwest of Kenora, Ontario (Lat. 49* 38'; Long. 9V57', N.T.S. 52-E-10). The property lies at the west end of Echo Bay on Lake of the Woods, or immediately northeast of Clytie Bay on Shoal Lake. The mineral claims,were staked by the writer in June 1983 to cover ground that was be lieved to have a high potential for hosting economic gold mineralization. The Echo Bay property lies just 7 miles (11.3 km) northeast of the Duport Mine, Shoal Lake where 2 million tons of 0.3 oz/T gold have been outlined by drilling in recent years, and just 8 miles (12.9 km) southeast of the High Lake gold camp where ex ploration is currently being conducted, and where reserves of 90,000 tons of 0.3 oz/T gold have been- outlined. The geology of the Echo Bay property has features in common with both of the neighbouring gold camps, yet little exploration work has been conducted in the Echo Bay region. A VLF-EM 16 ground survey was selected as the means to best evaluate the Echo Bay property during initial exploration. Twenty-three miles (37 km) of grid were established on the prop erty and a VLF-EM 16 survey was conducted over the full grid during June of this year (1984). This report outlines the re sults of the VLF-EM 16 survey while maps accompanying this re port show the Grid Area, the V1F-EM 16 Basic Data, and the Fraser Filtered In-Phase Data. VLF-EM 16 conductors have been identified, and described in the text of this report. LOCATION, ACCESS. TOPOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION
The Echo Bay property is located immediately west of Echo Bay, Lake of the Woods, or northeast of Clytie Bay, Shoal Lake, 23
Continued . . .
o* cu l
H to
3 l*
l U~*- ir
li S
H
^ *I y- ~, o
*
i
- 5 -
i*** A rt* , trtntn., M. o.,Out.
LOCATION nAP 7271OI' 206, l/O-l'lj i'*--ttS ,i*9Hintr*/ C/*,'m J
H O A L teway Point -\
Sc*tt
/: SO, ooo
iJ.T.S.
S3 -f - /O
S8-94--
- 6 LOCATION. ACCESS. TOPOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION - C ontinued
miles (37 km) southwest of Kenora, Ontario (Lat. 490 38', Long. 9V57' N.T.S. 52-E-10). The property can be reached in 45 min utes from Kenora via the Trans-Canada Highway #17, 22 miles (35 km), the Rush Bay road, k miles (6 km), and the Clytie Bay gravel road, 7 miles (11 km). Gravel roads extend to several parts of the property (see Fig. EB-84-2). Typical of the Canadian Shield the property features low relief with rounded rocky ridges rising only 100 feet (33 a) above the 1060 foot (323 m) base elevation of Lake of the Woods or Shoal Lake. The northeast trending ridges supporting a dense growth of balsam trees are separated by narrow, elongate, cedar, alder and willow swamps. Spruce, birch, poplar and pine trees are also common to the area. The region was logged for pulp wood several decades ago, and the new forest has grown in very thickly. Several beaver ponds cover large portions of the property. The Kenora region has a continental climate with warm summers (maximum 32*C) and cold winters (minimum -40*C). Snow cover can equal up to 3 feet (1 m) and lasts from early November until mid-April. CLAIM STATUS
The Echo Bay property was staked by the writer in June 1983. The 23 mineral claims making up the present property were record ed in Kenora on June 21, 1983* The mineral claims, located with in the Kenora Mining Division, are numbered 727201-208, 727210212, 727214-215, 727218-219, and 727224-23/. All 23 mineral claims are 100# owned by M. Morrison of Kelowna, B.C. The filing of this VLF-EM report will keep the claims in good standing until June 21, 1985. Continued . . .
- 7 -
HI STORY OF PBEVIOUS WORK
During the course of this year's survey several very old claim posts were noted in the region now covered by the Echo Bay property. However, there is little evidence of previous pros pecting on the property with the exception of some widely spaced shallow, blasted pits. Most rock outcroppings are moss covered, and have not been disturbed for years. REGIONAL GEOLOGY
Map 2443, Kenora - Fort Frances by the Ontario Geological Survey (OGS) illustrates the geology of the Shoal Lake and Lake of the Woods areas west of Kenora at a scale of 1 inch equals k miles. The map shows that a 20 mile wide belt of complexly folded Arch ean metavolcanics and metasediments extends across the northern portion of Lake of the Woods from 8 miles east of Kenora to Shoal Lake and the Manitoba border, 30 miles west of Kenora. The meta morphic rocks have been intruded by Early Precambrian stocks and dykes at several points, and most noteably south of Echo Bay on Lake of the Woods (the Canoe Lake Stock), and at High Lake, near the Manitoba border. Gold mineralization fringes both the Canoe Lake and High Lake intrusives. Past gold-silver producers lying near the Canoe Lake Stock in clude the Mikado, Cedar Island, and Olympia Mines with a total production of 33*600 oz of gold and 4000 oz of silver. The old Duport Mine on Stevens Island, Shoal Lake is located only k miles from the Canoe Lake Stock. Past production at this mine included 4672 oz of gold, 1,143 oz of silver. However, recent exploration has increased gold reserves at this old mine to 2 million tons of 0.3 oz Au/ton, or 600,000 oz of gold. At High Lake several small bodies of gold ore have been defined by drilling and the best reserves of the camp are 90,000 tons of 0.3 oz gold/Ton, although exploration continues. Continued . . .
- 8 -
REGIONAL GEOLOGY - C ontinued
At both the Shoal Lake and High Lake gold camps the gold orebodies are emplaced along shear zones, and the origin of the ore solutions appears to be genetically related to the Early Precambrian intrusives. The Echo Bay property covers geology that includes features common to both gold camps. A series of metavolcanic rocks ranging from acid to basic cross the property, and these are intruded by the Canoe Lake Stock, and by porphyry offshoots from the stock. The east-west trend of the High Lake geology meets with the northeast-southwest trend of the Shoal Lake geo logy on the Echo Bay property, and adjustments have been made along several faults that cross the property. It may also be seen on the regional geological map that the Canoe Lake Stock interrupts an anticline that crosses Shoal Lake and the Duport Mine property before it reaches the Echo Bay area. LOCAL GEOLOGY
Detailed mapping by the OGS at 1" = • i mile scale on Map 2069, Ewart-Forgie Area, and at 1" - i mile scale on Map P528, North Shoal Lake Area (East Sheet) shows that the geology of the Echo Bay property is varied. Metavolcanic rocks ranging from rhyolites to basalts cross the property from west to east separated by major strike faults or concordant quartz porphyry or gabbro dykes. Porphyritic granodiorite intrudes the metavolcanics at the southwest corner of the property, while grey granodiorite of the Canoe Lake Stock intrudes the metavolcanics from the south and southeast. North of the Canoe Lake Stock quartz porphyry dykes cut the metavolcanics discordantly. Although this year's program did not include prospecting or geo logical mapping, the following interesting rocks were noted during the course of the VLF-EM survey: { fee. pi^e. J l) Continued . . .
- 9 ACID VOLCANIC ROCKS
EARLIER ACID INTRUSIVE ROCKS
PRECAMBRIAN" PROTEROZOIC
7 7a 7b 7c
M Diabase.
49 Bedded rhyolitic and daciiic tuff, minor flows and agglomerate. 4b Massive fine-grained rhyolitic and dacilic tuff.
Porphyritic intrusive rocks. Porphyritic granodiorite. Quartz porphyry. feldspar porphyry,
INTRUSIVE CONTACT INTRUSIVE CONTACT
ARCHEAN
f
LATER ACID INTRUSIVE ROCKS j
D
3a Porphyritic (quartz) rhyolite flows with minor tuft, agglomerate, and quartz porphyry dikes. 3b Rhyo/itic agglomerate.
BASIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS
JO P ink quartz m onzonite and oranodiorite, with some grey foliated granodiorite. INTRUSIVE CONTACT
6a Quartz-hornblende diorite. 6b Hornblende diorite. 6c Diorite with much injected grano diorite. 6d Gabbro.
INTERMEDIATE VOLCANIC ROCKS l Intermediateandacidextrusiverocks. 2a Andesite, 2b Porphyritic andesite, le Andesite-dacite agglomerate. Id Andesite-dacite tuff, agglomerate and flows.
INTRUSIVE CONTACT
KEEWATIN GROUP""
9a Quartz monzonite, 9b Grey granodiorite. 9c Gneissic hornb/cnde-biotite grano diorite, with aplite, pegmatite, and dark inclusions. 9d Grey granodiorite with much pink granodiorite. 9e Tonalite and diorite. 9i Border phase of hybrid rocks and lit-par-lit gneiss. 9g Granodiorite with large feldspar "eyes."
METASEDIMENTS Sa Arkose. Sb Greywacke, arkosic greywacke, (tuff. Se Conglomerate, reworked agglomer ate. 5d Iron-rich greywacke. Se Slate, Iron-rich slate. Sf Siliceous siltstone, cherty sediments (tuff). 5g Garnet-rich greywacke.
BASIC VOLCANIC ROCKS 1 Basic and intermediate extrusive
rocks.
la 1b 1c 1d 1e
Andesite. Basalt. Tuff, lapilli tuff. Agglomerate and tuff. Interbanded lensy tuff, flows and sediments. 1f Horn blende-biotite-plagioclase schist, lg Gabbro, coarse-grained tuff and flows (possibly gabbro). 1h Pillow lava.
INTRUSIVE CONTACT*** CROWDUCK LAKE GROUP
8a Argillite and cherty argillite. 8b Arkose, arkosic greywacke, impure sandstone, (tuff?). Se Conglomerate. 8d Reworked agglomerate. Se Volcanic rocks.
fi
ECHO BAY PR0PERT Y(WRTH) UttS e4 -t-ht U/eitJ* - Sho*li*kt. Are*., h *n.r*.( M.O.,d,f
LOCAL
G EOLOGY
Htntrti IfrtO l - got, S/o-i'S , S'4- -l/S , S It -S W, 3*4- -OS
le O ••"'5 j
V*i-' - Forgie,
u.r.s. S2- f ft- 94- -3
- 10 INTRUSIVE CONTACT j PRECAMBRIAN L l'ROTERO7( l If Jl^ l') " 10
r
--iMETASEDIMF.NTS
j INTRUSIVE CONTACT
ARCHEAN •, LATE MAFIC DIKES J C| i.dM-ro, diorite,
lamprophyre
INTRUSIVE CONTACT [.ATE FELSIC INTRUSIVE RUCKS 8,1 Granodiorite
1
5a 5b 5c W 5e
Sandstone, volcanic sandstone Greywacke, tuff Conglomerate, volcanic conglomerate Slate, argillite Siliceous siltstone, cherty sediments
.MASSIVE FELSIC VOLCANIC ROCKS l ia Quartz porphyry0 "J 4b Feldspar porphyry" 4c Rhyolite 1" id Dacite 15
\ -x-
818c 8d 8r 81
- ., FELSIC VOLCANICLASTIC ROCKS Hybrid granodiorite 3 i 3a Coarse fragmental (angular) 'juartx porphyry, quarto-feldspar porphyry1 '. ,.J__i 3b Coarse fragmental (rounded) Fine-stained granodiorite 3c Fine fragmental Inclusion-rich p r;jnodiori t r Ft-ldspar porphyryINTERMEDIATE METAVOLCANICS 2a Andesite INTRUSIVE CONTACT 2b Porphyritic andesite EARLY FELSIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS 2c Rubbly andesite and broken pillows 7a Quartz diorite 2d Coarse fragmental 7b Hybrid quartz diorite 2e Fine fragmental
2f 2g
INTRUSIVE CONTACT , MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS
;
6a 61) 6c 6d 6e 6f 6g 6h
Amphibolite 3 Diorite Quartz gabbro, quartz diorite Gabbro" Porphyritic gabbro 3 Biotite gabbro and hornblendite Hornblendite and pyroxenite Peridotite
Agglomerate (rounded bombs) Silicified andesite 0
- -. .MAFIC METAVOLCANICS la Andesite Ib Basalt le Olivine basalt Id Coarse fragmental le Fine fragmental If Basalt with coarse feldspars lg Coarse flows or tuffb lh Agglomerate (rounded bombs)
L-Lj
/^^^s: Canoe L.
Clytie
PROPERTYf SOUTH)
LOCAL
G EOLOGY
- 11 LOCAL GEOLOGY - Continued Grid
13+70E 20N 19E 20+50N 14E 19+75N
6E
8+35N
15E 16+50N HE 11+75N 8E 5+60N 10E 11+05N 15+80E 3+90N ?E
3+60N
16+70E 5+75N 17E 5+75N 17E 20+40N 16E 18+75N 17+40E 29+90N
cherty rhyolite with 1# pyrite talcous, quartz-sericite schist highly siliceous volcanic rock with quartz veining highly siliceous volcanic rock with quartz veining quartz-sericite chlorite schist with disseminated pyrite waxy quartz-sericite schist with quartz veining and trace of tourmaline waxy quartz-sericite schist with quartz veining and trace of tourmaline feldspar porphyry with slicken side surfaces pyritized volcanic breccia with up to 5^ red garnets rhyolite breccia with 2# pyrite with matrix volcanic breccia with 1# pyrite with matrix volcanic breccia talcous rhyolite mylonized quartz porphyry acid volcanic, 1# quartz and car bonate veining, trace of arseno pyrite.
Several of the above listed rock types are common host rocks for gold mineralization at new gold deposits currently being explored in northwestern Ontario.
- 12 -
VLF-EM 16 SURVEY
A flagged grid totalling 23 miles (37 km) was established over the 23 mineral claims of the Echo Bay property using a Silva Ranger compass and a Topolite belt chain. North-south grid lines were established at 100 metre (328 feet) intervals and stations were marked at 25 metres (82 feet) along the lines. At least i±0 stations were established on each mineral claim to meet the Complete Coverage requirements for assessment work purposes for the property. A VLF-EM 16 Ronka instrument rented from Geolease of Mississauga was used in conducting the survey over the entire grid. Seattle, Washington was selected as the signal station that best aligned with the geology of the Echo Bay property. A strong signal was received from a direction of due west, and readings were, there fore, taken at right angles, or facing north along the grid lines. The angle of tilt (In-Phase) and the quadrature were recorded at each 25 metre (82 feet) survey station. The Basic VLF-EM Data has been plotted in profile form on Map EB-84-6, while the Fraser Filtered In-Phase Data has been contoured on Map EB-84-7. Con ductors have been identified with letter symbols on Map EB-84-7. The Fraser filtering technique has had widespread use in the handling of VLF-EM 16 data for over ten years. By means of simple mathematical operations the tilt data can be transformed into contourable form, and the effects of noise and topography can be filtered from data. By averaging pairs of stations and taking differences between pairs separated by the appropriate distance, values may be plotted and contoured in plan that transform cross overs into peaks, and a low-pass smoothing operator reduces noise. A full explanation of the Fraser filtering technique is given in geophysical papers by Fraser, Peterson and Ronka that are listed under references at the end of this report. Continued . . .
- 13 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE VLF-EM 16 SURVEY
Several strong VLF-EM conductors have been outlined by the con touring of the Fraser Filtered In-Phase Data on Map EB-84-7. These anomalies have been identified by the letters A to X on the map. Those anomalies aligned with the Power Line (and caused by the Power Line) have not been lettered. Northwest of the Power Line several narrow, elongate, discontinuous conductors cross the property for distances of several hundred metres. Some of the more continuous conductors align with swamps and valleys, which in turn align with faults mapped by the OGS on their Map #2069. These major faults have been plotted on our^Map EB-84-5 1 and identified with the same letters(B7E, G, H and I\ which were used to name the coincide VLF-EM conductors7^~TEere~~is such a good correlation between the mapped faults and the VLF-EM conductors that it might be assumed that elongate conductors A,C,D, also represent faults that have not yet been mapped, but which are sub-parallel to those that have been mapped by the OGS. Southeast of the Power Line crossing the Echo Bay property the VLF-EM conductors are much more discontinuous than those to the northwest of the Power Line, and this difference probably re flects the fact that strike faults are not well developed through the area. The Canoe Lake Stock with discordant offshooting dykes has apparently limited the extent of the faulting to the areas where VLF-EM conductors M, N and P cross the property. Conductors L, Q, S and X on the southern portion of the property are strong, but they run off of the property and their full extent is not known, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Several strong VLF-EM conductors crossing the Echo Bay property from west to east have been identified with the 1984 survey. Five of the major conductors coincide with faults mapped by the OGS, while several other conductors are believed to represent subparaContinued . . .
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS - C ontinued
llel faults that have not yet been mapped. Many of the conduc tors and faults align with narrow valleys that are occupied with cedar swamps and beaver ponds, and they are therefore difficult to verify. None of the pyritized zones observed correlate well with the VLFEM conductors, and it must therefore be concluded that while the VLF-EM 16 is a valuable instrument for outlining faults and shear zones, it is not a suitable instrument for defining low grade mineralization. The faulting outlined by the survey is considered important. Faulting is a necessary feature of most gold mines located within the Canadian Shield, and it would seem to be important in the Shoal Lake area as well. If mineralizing solutions have been gen erated 7 by the Canoe Lake Stock they will have been ultimately deposited along a shear structure at some point. The pyrite that we have viewed (and listed under the Local Geology section of this report) may be an indication of such deposition. At this point lithogeochemical sampling should be carried out in the regions of noted pyrite mineralization, or in regions border ing fault valleys. The samples should be analyzed for gold and silver (fire assay), and arsenic, copper and molybdenum. Arsenic should be a good indicator of gold mineralization as arsenopyrite is a common associate of gold at the Duport Mine. Chalco pyrite and molybdenite are common associates with gold at the High Lake Camp. Any encouragement from initial lithogeochemical sampling should be followed-up with a grid lithogeochemical survey. Areas with anom alous gold or silver or the associated elements near VLF-EM in ferred faults should be considered as diamond drill targets for economic gold mineralization.
- 15 REFERENCES
Blackburn, C.E., Beard, R.C., Rivett, S. 1981: Map 2443, Kenora-Fort Frances, Geological Compilation Series, OGS. Blackburn, C.E., Janes, D.A. 1983: Gold Deposits in Northwestern Ontario, pp. 194-210, The Geology of Gold in Ontario, edited by A.C. Colvine, OGS Miscellaneous Paper 110. Davis, J.C. 1965:
Fraser, D.C. 1969:
Geology of High Lake - Rush Bay Area, Dis trict of Kenora, Ontario Department of Mines, Report 41, Map 2068 and 2069.
Contouring of VLF-EM Data, Geophysics, Vol. 34. No. 6, December, 1969.
Peterson, N.R. and Ronka, V. 1969: Five Years of Surveying with the VLF-EM Method, A paper presented at the 1969 Annual Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
- 16 APPENDIX "A" STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
I, Murray Morrison, of the City of Kelowna, in the Province of British Columbia, do hereby state that: 1.
I graduated from the University of British Columbia in 1969 with a B.Se. Degree in Geology.
2.
I have been working in all phases of mining exploration in Canada for the past fourteen years.
3.
During the past fourteen years, I have intermittently held responsible positions as a geologist with various mineral exploration campanies in Canada.
4.
During the past two years I have examined many mineral properties in Northwestern Ontario.
5.
I have carried out several VLF-EM Surveys in British Columbia in recent years.
6.
I personally supervised the VLF-EM 16 Survey outlined in this report.
7.
I own full title to the Echo Bay Property mineral claims described in this report.
August 10, 1984 Kelowna, B.C.
Murray Morrison, B.Se.
Report of Work Natural Resources
t r. . . -, . (Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
Ontario
/J
^ 5aE10NW9497 2 .7066 ECHO BAY
900
The Minim Township or Area
/,^,W
Claim Holderl*}
VLF-Zn
iL^ii
u r r Ay
/yv _
(jr /ASS
f? L*"* S A i';
Prospector's Licence No.
S.
rr
Address
^A
B. C,
Vlk/
Survey Company
Total Miles of line Cut ****J ^ A^f
Narne and Address of Author (of Geo Technical report)
t//' Credits Requesfed per Each Claim in Columns at right Special Provisions
Days per Claim
Geophysical
For first survey:
- Electromagnetic
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
O y-.
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence) Prefix
K
Mining Claim Number
- Other Geological Geochemical
Man Days
Days per Claim
Geophysical
Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here
i
7272rj
j
~)B-7 2C+
\
1Z7ZC5-
\
?Z72tt
\
7272*7
- Electromagnetic
~?272c#
- Magnetometer
7^7^/^
- Radiometric
-7^7 a x/
- Other
-7^7^/a 7^7 ^/^ u 7^7 2 /.r
Geological Geochemical Airborne Credits
Days per Claim
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Mining Claim Number
Expend. Dayi Cr.
7272*2
- Radiometric
Enter 20 days (for each)
Prefix
1 -727 z*/
- Magnetometer
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Expend. Days Cr.
R.ECE1VE D
tfflr^nsa 4 WIN. NG LANDS SEI T i ON
727,0 /^
Electromagnetic
727 2 /f K E N O R /
i 737 zaj-
Magnetometer Radiometric
!
l Expenditures (excludes power stripping)
72722S" 727^2^
{Type of Work Performed
727^37 [Performed on Claim(s)
MINING
DiV.
- i" Mtr-
t , -J I.; :; V/
jll
x t^
JUN a j 19f 4
AM O -JA 11 1O 1 O ' 7i8i JiiUilllJilllZlv
72722^
,M
^ir| ij
727.227 Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total Expenditures
! Total Days Credits
S (Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
iDate
7^72J^ 7272f/
^^ ^ ^^ X ^j^/ X ^^
*^y ^^ ^X y l ^1 ^ 7 p/ L/ X
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
^ ^J
Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature) S?*--^
rtification Verifying Report l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true. Mam* and Postal Address of Person Certifying
V) Date Certified
52 (61/9)
f**e2./,/*}
by
1984 11 01
Your File: 148-84 Our File: 2.7066
Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resources 808 Robertson Street Box 5080 Kenora, Ontario P9N 3X9 Dear Madam: RE: Notice of Intent dated October 16, 1984 Gfephyslcal (Electromagnetic) Survey on Mining Claims K 727201 et al In the Township of Glass The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of intent, have been approved as of the above date. Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records. Yours sincerely.
S.E. Yundt Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1U3 Phone:(416)965-4888 D. Isherwood:mc cc: Murray S. Morrison 684 Balsam Road Kelowna, B.C. VIM 1B9 cc: Resident Geologist Kenora, Ontario Encl.
cc: Mr. G.H. Ferguson Mining ft Lends Commissioner Toronto, Ontario
/^jv Ministry OT \\Yl Natural *ources
lecnnicai Assess)merit ... . ^ ... Work Credits
File 2.7066 Date
19841016
Mining Recorder's Report of
WofkV
148-84
Recorded Holder
MURRAY S. MORRISON Township or Area
GLASS TOWNSHIP Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim
Mining Cliims Assessed
Geophysical 20
Elartrnmiignittic
*- w
day*
Inrfiirart polarization
rlays
Ot^er
Hays
K 727201 to 208 inclusive 727210 to 212 inclusive 727214-215 727218 727224 to 231 inclusive
Section 77 (19) S** "Mining Claims Aliened" column ftpnlngiral
davi
Geochemical
days
Man days D
Airborne d
Special provision txl
Ground fyl
Q Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims. O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
10 DAYS K 727219
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims U not sufficiently covered by the survey
LJ I nsufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77119) 60: 828 I 83JB)
ano
Ministry of Natural Resources
1-984 10 16
Your File: 148-84 Our File: 2.7066
Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resources 808 Robertson Street Box 5080
Kenora, Ontario P9N 3X9 Dear Madam: Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets. For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888. sincerely,
ndt
_ tor Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 D. Isherwood:me
Encls. cc: Murray S. Morrison 684 Balsam Road Kelowna, B.C. V1W 1B9
845
cc: Mr. 6.H. Ferguson Mining S Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario
Ontario
Ministry of Natural
Notice of Intent
Resources
for Technical Reports 1984 10 16
2.7066/148-84
An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged. If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application. If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded. If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.
846 182/6)
REGISTERED Octobar 9, 1984
File: 2.7066
Murray S. Morrison 684 Balsan Road Kalowna, B.C. VIM 189 Dear Sir: RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey submitted on Mining Claims K 727201 at al 1n the Township of Glass Enclosed 1s a copy of our letter datad August 31, 1984 requesting additional Information for the above-mentioned survey. Unless you can provide the required data by Octobar 19, 1984 the mining recorder will be directed to cancel the work credits recorded on June 21, 1984. For further Information, please contact Mr. Ray Pichett* at (416)965-4888. Yours sincerely,
S. E. Yundt Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1M3 Phone:(416)965-4888 S. Hurst:mc
cc: Mining Recorder Kenora, Ontario Encl.
Telephone: (604) 764-4073 four File:
2.7066 684 Balsam -Road, Kelowna, B.C. V1W 1B9 October 4, 198
Mr. S. E. Yundt, Director, Land Management Branch, Whitney Block, Room 6643, Queen's Park, Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Dear Sir: RE:
RECEIVED
Land Management BrancH CIRCULATE COMMENTS KBktE BY
fcl-\
i. l '-v
LJ f~|
- ':)
OH j O 1984
mm uuos SECTION
OCT 101984 S. E. YUNDT
•Mr.
J. R. MORTON J. C. SMITH W. L. 3OOD
Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey Submitted on Mining Claims K727201 et al in Glass Township_________ O R. 6043
As requested by you in a letter dated August 31, 1984, I now submit 2 copies of Map EB-84-6A showing the Inphase and Quadrature readings taken at each grid station on the above mentioned claims. The new map is made at the same scale as Map EB-84-6 showing the profiles of the Inphase and Quadrature values, and it may be used to overlay the earlier map. I am enclosing two copies of each of Maps EB-84-6 and EB-84-6A.
Yours very sincerely, M. Morrison MM/fh Ends.
August 31, 1984
File: 2.7066
Murray S. Morrison 684 Balsam Road Kelowna, B.C. VIM 1B9 Dear Sir:
RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey submitted on Mining Claims K 727201 et al 1n Glass Township Enclosed Is the plan, 1n duplicate, for the abovementioned survey. Please plot the Inphase and Quadrature readings at each station on the plans and return them to this office quoting file 2.7066. For further Information, please contact Mr. Doug Isherwood at (416)965-4888. Yours sincerely.
S.E. Yundt
Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888
D. l sherwood: me cc: Mining Recorder Kenora, Ontario Encl.
1984 08 24
Your Flit: 148 Our File: 2.7066
Mrs. Nary Ellen Lenay Acting Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resources 808 Robertson Street Box 5080 Kenora* Ontario P9N 3X9 Dear Madaa: He have received reports and naps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey subnltted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims K 727201 et al 1n the Township of Glass. This material will be examined and assessed and
a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued. Yours sincerely,
S.E. Yundt
Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block. Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto. Ontario M7A 1H3
Phone: (416)965-6918 A. Barrtse cc: Murray S. Morrison 684 Sal sem Road Kelowna, B.C. V1W 189
684 Balsam Road, Kelowna, B.C. V1W 1B9 August 16, Att'n: Mr. Arthur Barr, Director, Land Administration Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources, 6643 Whitney Block, Toronto, Ontario M?A 1W3 Dear Sir: Re:
Geophysical Work Conducted on Mineral Claims 727201-208."" 210-212.^214-215^ 2l8-21tfT and 22/4.-251 of the Kenora
Mining Division. On June 21, 1984 a "Report of Work" for the above listed min eral claims was filed at the Kenora Mining Division Office. As required by the Mining Act I herewith enclose 2 copies of a report entitled "VLF-EM 16 Ground Survey, Echo Bay Property, Kenora, Ontario" for the claims listed in the Report of Work. I hope that the report meets all the requirements for Special Provisions Coverage of the property. Yours sincerely, Murray Morrison MM/fh
RECEIVED
Ends.
AUG 2 O 1984 MINING LANDS SECTION
/4-
/
l./.i .1/1
m L-
106
\ J \
107
j ' l
269
l '/* l
U! j7/* l l l
1 71 i l/ i "1 - -|i/! 4y i 1
!
i4 !
i
7/7
i IV i "'r
't /! i ^ l l/ L j..."..."
17 i i y 1'
.1:^
i i "l
r
~"!
i t i
:
;-|
H
i
i
;
" ""si ir i ; 7."...l 'i
l f l s
it 1
l
Mining Lands Section
File No
Control Sheet
TYPE OF SURVEY
EOPHYSICAL GEOLOGICAL GEOCHEMICAL EXPENDITURE
MINING LANDS COMMENTS:
Signature of Assessor
s
Date
m s
Q
EC^G BVA
KOA8 ib
S i? S to S bo in o
m
in
o
(A
o OOOOO
10
O
jj
O
O
—
-J
-
•c.
OJ
(O
O
^ z o
.* o
3 O. O X
5
1O ID 03
ffi
— f\j M
— CD CD
— CD 00
CD
^
O
m
— ffi (0
ffi
w Q3
(p
CD
(71
di Q)
Ol
ex
00
Ol
u
T O
l w C
03 •n > O m
o
ni M m m O) w
CD
r
3)
D ~ W Q c X
BAY
(SHOAL LAKE)
U!
O 3
z:
a S —— <-i
Q 3
O)
CL ^ (rt o
fi o. in
i-f (O
-,
a o. C/)
(D W
O O (It
O
u I!. Q. lO
to S Vi
o — 3 o
o
r —
H m
S- 0
O
CO
o m
w
CO
O 58
tt
O
o CA
I w U1
INDIAN
H
O
Z
~
M.1975
O)
I o
m
i
r\) 01 OJ CO
CLEARWATER
o CO
FI
5i rn
o TD "D
O
O w
m
m
O) O
-i OJ
O)
o H
o
ro 3D
o o
en
O
M.2062
BAY
ci Z r- c
o
J) O
O
m
CO "D O
^
o
o 3}
m
c Tl
o ~Z.
o x
m o ^ L -z m i/)
en r2: m
o
-D O C
O '
p? m
m
O
o x m o
i m jj
O 3J
C^ z m
O
CO
^
M P
to 7. m o
O
c/) o CD
CTJ
-a m ^ co
m z o
o o
o
x
m
? m S co
O)
o O
x d
33 O
m
o
en B C l
o o O
C"
CO
C
-o
ru
I\J
Cft
Cx
m
rn
Lake
of
-hA
L e. g fl/i a —— a r A *e l r o Ads
SOP 400 X " -
gp
g
-t- f 7 '
so
200
i c f* * JOj^t r~ ^ /O /lCCtf/n^jtfny
F~l**4Ctl
ct--' lf*A t; i
G-r/J Established fifftt-Ln
G C O ph y S t C.* I
J\f
M,
ECHO BAY P ROPERTY
U///A 5c// C ha.in An J
Be/T
A
an d
CLAIMS -
D raw"
GRID -
S^RF^CF F EATURES
i* j *5
52E10NW9497 2,7866 ECHO BAY
: SOOO
ffl
Nt
n\
IV
OJ
m
o
m
ro
w ij( m
r\) o^
IM
m
ma gnei c J acl i n+iion
—— /8A/
l OH-
l nSTrxrmtnT ^ fi*ci
en
E8-8f-S -for Jef*//*,/
Sf'ATt' on
rv —
in tT
See fraser
E B-
tn-Ph4.se
Ste. W*? E 8
for fn-
8* Sic
3A/
Ple&se. sec.
E8-8+-5
Miner*/
loo
fat
r /oo
50
o
3oo f Cm . SO m
To Accompany
n,
ECHO
("SOU
G-dop/tyj?i CAl
BAY
PROPERTY
n.o
LAKE OF THEWOODS - SHOAL
VLF-EM
SURVEY nd
KENORA
. 224 -2*/
7 27201 -
M. M. 52EieNW9497 2.7066 ECHO BAY
M- C.'*
H.T.S. f t- E- /O
220
Scm/f. l: SOOO
MAP
es- 94- -e
m
rn
m
TV
en m
m
m
ro TU m
r\l
04
^
rn
rn
m
2 f A/
— /f v
/7A/ ——
/S A/
/4-A/ ——
— /3A/
—— IS.N
ION
O eon i c S
E M - /g
f
Rending S T* ktn
Mi* Z8-8+-S E8~84~-6
f+tinq A/or+A.
-fer Drt+'tlcJ G-riJ. for Profiles of ln-PA*se, anj QmtJrA-kuTe
J^Ap E8-ft4-~~? -for Fraser Fi/^trfJ In-fb^se.
— 8" —
7-V
—a
—— ON
——
M
SCO
5OQ 4-00 3OO SOO /OO
-5 C 100
SO
O
50
/OO
4-00
300
c r* - SO m
To A ccompany
ECHO
ic.*'
A
B/ir
Report
PROPERTY
LAKE OFTHEWOODS-SHOyiLLAKE^RW.KEWOM M.D. VLF-fH I/V-PW^SE
*J
/tf
5URVFY
QUADRATURE fi^S/C
, tin-Hi,
, 1/1-2/1, ^ ^4- e ii
t/, r- s. f 2 - f - /o
M. M. 5SE1CNW9497 2.7066 ECHO BAY
230
fi. c.*
Sc*/*
/.' 5,000
MAP
FB-8+-6A
tt
(Vi
M O,
ru
ru
ru *
P"
o*
•n
2JA/
on
J 7 A/
BASIC 3)*Tk.
ri
form JOfiJ
6-r,/
—— 2 V
foo
SO
/DO
S oo
O
Zoo
(00
3oo
l c pi * 3"O m
j S&
Geophysical
Tp
Repo r~t
ECHO BAY PROPERTY , M. Q
LAKE OFTHEWOODS-SWOAL LAKE AREA,
VLF-En
16
S URVEY
r f l -here tl
727SOI-
-2/2 t 2 /4- . 5-3-5-
M. M. 52S10NW9497 2 .7366 ECHO BAY
D AT
: S"000
-7
